If you can't handle the inherent possibilities that come from being in public, then you shouldn't be in public. Its not societies problem to deal with your fragile, emotional reactions.
Because if this was a man with ill intentions, she just absolutely fed his predatory ego by showing how easily she is broken and shaken by him just existing near him. She has shown massive weakness as a response to being under threat, which makes her actually retarded. The fact that he responded that way, proves his intentions weren't that ill in the slightest.
Also, trusting a woman's recollection of an event she is emotionally invested in and in which she is the victim to be accurate in the slightest is also retarded. Its entirely possible his reaction was calm, and she perceived it as far harsher than it was to fulfill the narrative her paranoid mind had already created.
Why are you so triggered that this woman didn’t act with the utmost kindness and politeness when she felt threatened? Would you rather her just politely discuss with the man when he’s 3 feet away? What’s the appropriate response? You are not owed politeness by a random person.
And yes - causing a scene CAN deter a threat. As was said in her other video, the parking lot was nearly empty and the guy (negro) was walking QUICKLY directly at her.
If your alarm bells aren’t going off you’re living in a fairy land.
Because "felt threatened" and "actually in threat" are not the same. We have spent decades enabling women's paranoia that every man is out to get them at any moment, which means I believe little of her actual details are accurate. While you seem to believe every single one, because I guess "believe women." The story told, the immediate video after with "literally shaking you guys omg" ring more alarm bells of "victim milking" than any possibility.
You aren't owed politeness, in either direction. If if it totally acceptable for her to react like a histrionic to him with no provocation, he is totally acceptable in doing the same.
If you can't handle the inherent possibilities that come from being in public, then you shouldn't be in public. Its not societies problem to deal with your fragile, emotional reactions.
Because if this was a man with ill intentions, she just absolutely fed his predatory ego by showing how easily she is broken and shaken by him just existing near him. She has shown massive weakness as a response to being under threat, which makes her actually retarded. The fact that he responded that way, proves his intentions weren't that ill in the slightest.
Also, trusting a woman's recollection of an event she is emotionally invested in and in which she is the victim to be accurate in the slightest is also retarded. Its entirely possible his reaction was calm, and she perceived it as far harsher than it was to fulfill the narrative her paranoid mind had already created.
Why are you so triggered that this woman didn’t act with the utmost kindness and politeness when she felt threatened? Would you rather her just politely discuss with the man when he’s 3 feet away? What’s the appropriate response? You are not owed politeness by a random person.
And yes - causing a scene CAN deter a threat. As was said in her other video, the parking lot was nearly empty and the guy (negro) was walking QUICKLY directly at her.
If your alarm bells aren’t going off you’re living in a fairy land.
Because "felt threatened" and "actually in threat" are not the same. We have spent decades enabling women's paranoia that every man is out to get them at any moment, which means I believe little of her actual details are accurate. While you seem to believe every single one, because I guess "believe women." The story told, the immediate video after with "literally shaking you guys omg" ring more alarm bells of "victim milking" than any possibility.
You aren't owed politeness, in either direction. If if it totally acceptable for her to react like a histrionic to him with no provocation, he is totally acceptable in doing the same.