There is no rule against accusing public figures. They can remove the post if they want, but there's no rule against it unless it's a known falsehood, which it is not.
On the other hand, maybe it's good if you get banned. You're getting more psycho by the day, and you need a break. Forget I said a thing.
And I'm not going to help you out in the future either by alerting you. Too much of a spoiled brat. Imagine trying to lecture me on what violates the rules. Go get banned if you want.
Interestingly, the Daily Mail is reporting one of the girls was killed for tripping the alarm. The other one was the daughter of a preacher who was likely targeted.
Maybe she wanted to hit male targets, but got busted before she could.
The manifesto will tell us, but the police are saying they won't publish it.
There is no rule against accusing public figures. They can remove the post if they want, but there's no rule against it unless it's a known falsehood, which it is not.
On the other hand, maybe it's good if you get banned. You're getting more psycho by the day, and you need a break. Forget I said a thing.
And I'm not going to help you out in the future either by alerting you. Too much of a spoiled brat. Imagine trying to lecture me on what violates the rules. Go get banned if you want.
A woman killed six people and I'm the psycho for saying we should make sure they get the blame. Logic.
Just yesterday, you were claiming that the motive was "feminism", and that she only killed males.
You got it right in one try.
No, it's fine. By that same logic, I think you should get the blame for all the male school shooters! Bye.
Interestingly, the Daily Mail is reporting one of the girls was killed for tripping the alarm. The other one was the daughter of a preacher who was likely targeted.
Maybe she wanted to hit male targets, but got busted before she could.
The manifesto will tell us, but the police are saying they won't publish it.