It's important to do this rather than knee-jerk assume, there are shit heads out there that pull this on purpose. They sit there whining about free speech then you find out they've been spamming threats and racial slurs at people. Not many platforms if they kept spamming that in earnest would really let that go on.
I'm not talking about hate speech, personally I don't really care about the racial slurs myself but if it was properly directed against someone on the platform and the evidence was blatant I'd completely understand. I think this is why realistically people should always be wary of the free speech grift. It often falls apart when faced with the reality of being a doxxable business owner of any kind.
Yes it's shitty in some cases and I'm not excusing it, honest, but it's the same way some people out there honestly expect business owners to risk a jail sentence for not handing over something to law enforcement because of some edgy retards that decided to use their site or business to do something heinous.
It's because of this that when examining multiplayer game development as an example I've had to really consider the merits of just having no communication tools beyond pinging or pre-scripted messages because the glowies are clamping down on that shit hard. I do not want to be on the receiving end of some fed op and get caught up on something because of a retard posting something in game chat somewhere and making me liable.
I'll take 90% free speech over 0% free speech. The platform you're asking for is too radical to exist right now and we have to progress in that direction. We can't warp there. The left go away with so much because they were willing to slow-walk, and make manifest the slippery slope.
We have to slippery slope ourselves back to free speech absolutism.
It's important to do this rather than knee-jerk assume, there are shit heads out there that pull this on purpose. They sit there whining about free speech then you find out they've been spamming threats and racial slurs at people. Not many platforms if they kept spamming that in earnest would really let that go on.
Spamming threats is relevant the slur part is not
That is a "free speech" check and the platform failed. All speech is speech.
I'm not talking about hate speech, personally I don't really care about the racial slurs myself but if it was properly directed against someone on the platform and the evidence was blatant I'd completely understand. I think this is why realistically people should always be wary of the free speech grift. It often falls apart when faced with the reality of being a doxxable business owner of any kind.
Yes it's shitty in some cases and I'm not excusing it, honest, but it's the same way some people out there honestly expect business owners to risk a jail sentence for not handing over something to law enforcement because of some edgy retards that decided to use their site or business to do something heinous.
It's because of this that when examining multiplayer game development as an example I've had to really consider the merits of just having no communication tools beyond pinging or pre-scripted messages because the glowies are clamping down on that shit hard. I do not want to be on the receiving end of some fed op and get caught up on something because of a retard posting something in game chat somewhere and making me liable.
Lol no you do not have the right to threaten people
I'll take 90% free speech over 0% free speech. The platform you're asking for is too radical to exist right now and we have to progress in that direction. We can't warp there. The left go away with so much because they were willing to slow-walk, and make manifest the slippery slope.
We have to slippery slope ourselves back to free speech absolutism.