He was lucky to get the appeal. If he had said what he said with a little more aggression (he had left the "victim" "distraught" by referring to him as a "man" or "gentleman" nine times - the fact that this was recorded proves that it was the reason for his initial conviction, and every news article left or right goes with that) the sentence would have been upheld.
someone else posted the news article. all I'm saying is to link the article and not a blog, or at least a blog that itself links an article. that way we know this is legit.
I need more proof for an incident like this than a blog post. Anyone can make shit up.
I'm sorry but you can easily Google him.
He was lucky to get the appeal. If he had said what he said with a little more aggression (he had left the "victim" "distraught" by referring to him as a "man" or "gentleman" nine times - the fact that this was recorded proves that it was the reason for his initial conviction, and every news article left or right goes with that) the sentence would have been upheld.
someone else posted the news article. all I'm saying is to link the article and not a blog, or at least a blog that itself links an article. that way we know this is legit.
It's unlikely this is true. Prevent is already filled with referals for "misogynists" and the UK is notoriously pro-TERF.
How can you disagree with me when there was an independent review that confirmed it to be true?
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1134986/Independent_Review_of_Prevent.pdf