Firstly it's a false equivocation of normal sexuality with demonic perversion. And secondly they deliberately avoid putting up any pictures of the thing they're trying to defend. Because any normal human being who lays eyes on it immediately begins thinking that violence would be justified in stopping it.
You've got to stop using words like "demonic," it undermines any good points you make and people can fixate on it to dismiss your point of view. Can you prove or competently argue "demonic" presence? No, but you can easily argue against drag nonsense and false equivalencies.
Nah, you do your own arguments and the rest of us anti-leftists a disservice. You can nail the gross unethical conduct and lack of logic by leftists with argument, but when you introduce your own illogical or speculative stuff and leave the realm of rationalism, you're really no better than they are. Religious nutjob retards with accusations of "demons" aren't going to win jackshit.
Leftist nonsense is ideology, religion is ideology with a spiritual twist. Congrats, you're now just throwing dogma against dogma and are easily dismissed for the same reasons leftists are totally and obviously wrong -- they can't objectively back up shit and they live in a fantasy land.
Leftist nonsense is ideology, religion is ideology with a spiritual twist. Congrats, you're now just throwing dogma against dogma and are easily dismissed for the same reasons leftists are totally and obviously wrong -- they can't objectively back up shit and they live in a fantasy land.
Ideologies are just set of beliefs and values shared by people. Atheism is an ideology, so is Agnosticism, for instance. We're always throwing dogma against dogma no matter what, especially when it comes to politics / morals / ethics / etc.
Even if you focus 100% on science, there's many things science will never be able to explain, and realistically our science is more often wrong than right anyway. We also saw that with Covid, it's just as easy to manipulate science as it is to manipulate any religion (or lack of). Basically, it's super easy to turn science into yet another ideology, because humans always go back to simple ideas that are easy to remember.
Also, science is amoral, it won't be able to tell you if killing someone is ok or not. It won't be able to tell you if drag queens shows are ok or not. You know what can? The Bible and the Word of God, something that helped create the foundations of civilization and managed to survive and thrive through thousands of generations already. Granted its success over the entire world and how it helped us reach this point where people can complain about their own freedom, I'd say it's proved it's reliable at this point.
Notice the inherent dishonesty here.
Firstly it's a false equivocation of normal sexuality with demonic perversion. And secondly they deliberately avoid putting up any pictures of the thing they're trying to defend. Because any normal human being who lays eyes on it immediately begins thinking that violence would be justified in stopping it.
You've got to stop using words like "demonic," it undermines any good points you make and people can fixate on it to dismiss your point of view. Can you prove or competently argue "demonic" presence? No, but you can easily argue against drag nonsense and false equivalencies.
Sure I can. Google "Strzock smile.". Then tell me demons aren't real.
Nah, you do your own arguments and the rest of us anti-leftists a disservice. You can nail the gross unethical conduct and lack of logic by leftists with argument, but when you introduce your own illogical or speculative stuff and leave the realm of rationalism, you're really no better than they are. Religious nutjob retards with accusations of "demons" aren't going to win jackshit.
Leftist nonsense is ideology, religion is ideology with a spiritual twist. Congrats, you're now just throwing dogma against dogma and are easily dismissed for the same reasons leftists are totally and obviously wrong -- they can't objectively back up shit and they live in a fantasy land.
Ideologies are just set of beliefs and values shared by people. Atheism is an ideology, so is Agnosticism, for instance. We're always throwing dogma against dogma no matter what, especially when it comes to politics / morals / ethics / etc.
Even if you focus 100% on science, there's many things science will never be able to explain, and realistically our science is more often wrong than right anyway. We also saw that with Covid, it's just as easy to manipulate science as it is to manipulate any religion (or lack of). Basically, it's super easy to turn science into yet another ideology, because humans always go back to simple ideas that are easy to remember.
Also, science is amoral, it won't be able to tell you if killing someone is ok or not. It won't be able to tell you if drag queens shows are ok or not. You know what can? The Bible and the Word of God, something that helped create the foundations of civilization and managed to survive and thrive through thousands of generations already. Granted its success over the entire world and how it helped us reach this point where people can complain about their own freedom, I'd say it's proved it's reliable at this point.