Seriously, what is this fascination with taxing the productive to pay for the reproductive?
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (28)
sorted by:
That's a whole different problem and a very different demographic. Short term time preferences are the root problem in both cases. In one case only caring about affordability instead of biological viability, and in the other case they're barely more than animals who can't think an hour into the future.
There is not a single stable country that prioritizes births over productivity. It's a sign of a failed state.
Make line go up only ever leads to mass immigration and demographic replacement by barbarians.
Degeneracy is not a viable path.
Not even the CCP could make women treat men like human beings, and they managed to erase the existence of an entire historical event.
It's not possible. It will never be possible. Every attempt has been a hugely expensive failure. Natural population reduction might be the best path forward due to AI and automation.
If you actually think that, go ahead and sign on with the left already, they're the depopulationists.
And besides, I'm not arguing for women to have a choice in the matter.