I'm not going to quote-reply you because it gets too messy, so just recognize your specific comments when I get to them. Marriage, as to say: pair-bonding, is always beneficial unless you are tying yourself to someone who is actually damaging or dangerous. Most of the time, even a loveless marriage actually still benefits both parties and particularly the children, if those parties were to actually do what I said and not entirely sabotage the relationship.
Woman's nature is not the nature of the state. Feminism pushed these changes because Leftists balkanized people and applied a Marxist dialectic, which they've been doing forever. Women's nature is to seek protection. Cucking men, caused women to reach out to the government, which is why the government embraces feminism as a mechanism of control.
Yes, rejuvenation is the point. That's what a good wife is actually going to do. A healthy relationship means you actually enjoy your woman and she can inspire her man. No, a dishwasher or a microwave does not replace anyone. This is actually a classic Left-wing economics mistake. Capital investment doesn't remove labor, it makes labor more efficient, which then requires less of that labor so the people working can do other things. No microwave can beat a woman cooking a healthy meal for her husband. A vacuum doesn't mean that a man doesn't have to clean the house, just that he can clean it faster. A woman with a vacuum means she can clean it at the same speed, but he doesn't have to do it at all, saving him significant time.
Evolutionary biology shows that Homo Sapiens are polyamorous, not polygamous. Pair bonding has always existed in every civilization, and in non-civilizations. Where hypergamy has existed, it was the result of authoritarian power structures. Harems are not the norm. Women aren't like birds which are biologically driven to not find another mate even after their mate's death; but that's not the same as being incapable of loyalty.
Yes, we do have to pull women's protections too, that's actually an essential feature. If women can be protected by the state, the state can give them a short-sighted offer to join the pharaoh's harem, but it will leave both men and women unhappy while fostering an authoritarian society.
You're removing men's agency when you're claiming that your "body pumps you with enough chemicals". My exact point is that modern men are wildly undisciplined. It's not impossible to resist some basic urges with discipline and stoicism. Men need to square themselves away, not get into any relationships, and only when they have the discipline and dominance for it, get into one relationship. Until then, buy a fleshlight or some shit. That's why feminists get really mad about sex bots. The "modern women" phenomenon is making it clear that a lot of these propagandized women don't have anything else to offer than what the sex bot does. Except they have worse personalities. As a stripper I talked to once said, "men don't typically objectify women, instead they personify objects as women." The fact that waifus are displacing women is not from a man's need for sex, but a man's need for a relationship, which they have a selection pressure over, but typically don't know.
I haven't misdiagnosed the problem. I'm actually saying that the solution is for men to work around it. Women aren't going to change because women operate in the aesthetic. Women change for men who can secure them. Of all of the former Leftist women I've spoken to, it was universally something like: "as soon as I got my boyfriend, I stopped hanging out with feminists. They seemed kinda crazy all of the sudden." That protection racket that the government establishes, it's inherently inferior to your own personal man that can do all of that for you, correctly, in a timely manner, and can also give you children. Men are way better than government or ideology, many women have just been propagandized, but their biological imperatives do push them in the correct direction.
On top of that, it isn't all women. In a scale of 1-10, my two friends who are both 1's just got married because there was no way the girl who was a 1 was gonna marry a 3. Yes, I know that cuckolding exists, but that's not normal for either men or women, just Leftists.
I'm not going to quote-reply you because it gets too messy, so just recognize your specific comments when I get to them. Marriage, as to say: pair-bonding, is always beneficial unless you are tying yourself to someone who is actually damaging or dangerous. Most of the time, even a loveless marriage actually still benefits both parties and particularly the children, if those parties were to actually do what I said and not entirely sabotage the relationship.
Woman's nature is not the nature of the state. Feminism pushed these changes because Leftists balkanized people and applied a Marxist dialectic, which they've been doing forever. Women's nature is to seek protection. Cucking men, caused women to reach out to the government, which is why the government embraces feminism as a mechanism of control.
Yes, rejuvenation is the point. That's what a good wife is actually going to do. A healthy relationship means you actually enjoy your woman and she can inspire her man. No, a dishwasher or a microwave does not replace anyone. This is actually a classic Left-wing economics mistake. Capital investment doesn't remove labor, it makes labor more efficient, which then requires less of that labor so the people working can do other things. No microwave can beat a woman cooking a healthy meal for her husband. A vacuum doesn't mean that a man doesn't have to clean the house, just that he can clean it faster. A woman with a vacuum means she can clean it at the same speed, but he doesn't have to do it at all, saving him significant time.
Evolutionary biology shows that Homo Sapiens are polyamorous, not polygamous. Pair bonding has always existed in every civilization, and in non-civilizations. Where hypergamy has existed, it was the result of authoritarian power structures. Harems are not the norm. Women aren't like birds which are biologically driven to not find another mate even after their mate's death; but that's not the same as being incapable of loyalty.
Yes, we do have to pull women's protections too, that's actually an essential feature. If women can be protected by the state, the state can give them a short-sighted offer to join the pharaoh's harem, but it will leave both men and women unhappy while fostering an authoritarian society.
You're removing men's agency when you're claiming that your "body pumps you with enough chemicals". My exact point is that modern men are wildly undisciplined. It's not impossible to resist some basic urges with discipline and stoicism. Men need to square themselves away, not get into any relationships, and only when they have the discipline and dominance for it, get into one relationship. Until then, buy a fleshlight or some shit. That's why feminists get really mad about sex bots. The "modern women" phenomenon is making it clear that a lot of these propagandized women don't have anything else to offer than what the sex bot does. Except they have worse personalities. As a stripper I talked to once said, "men don't typically objectify women, instead they personify objects as women." The fact that waifus are displacing women is not from a man's need for sex, but a man's need for a relationship, which they have a selection pressure over, but typically don't know.
I haven't misdiagnosed the problem. I'm actually saying that the solution is for men to work around it. Women aren't going to change because women operate in the aesthetic. Women change for men who can secure them. Of all of the former Leftist women I've spoken to, it was universally something like: "as soon as I got my boyfriend, I stopped hanging out with feminists. They seemed kinda crazy all of the sudden." That protection racket that the government establishes, it's inherently inferior to your own personal man that can do all of that for you, correctly, in a timely manner, and can also give you children. Men are way better than government or ideology, many women have just been propagandized, but their biological imperatives do push them in the correct direction.
On top of that, it isn't all women. In a scale of 1-10, my two friends who are both 1's just got married because there was no way the girl who was a 1 was gonna marry a 3. Yes, I know that cuckolding exists, but that's not normal for either men or women, just Leftists.