Blah blah.... my opinion...blah...women good...blah... men bad...blah... go get married.
FFS. Just. Please stop.
In the immediate moment, you cut expenses, maximize his agency, while the wife keeps him constantly pushing the limits of his responsibility and agency. Allowing him to be happier and more fulfilled.
WHAAAT!
maximize his agency.
Where the hell did you find this nugget? Which sociology professor told you this steaming pill of hogwash. I am going to need to see proof of this. Source right now or your whole thread is suspect.
This is perhaps the most ignorant crap I have read here all week. Look sweetie, I know feminism is now telling you marriage is good. But for over half a century it has been telling women that marriage is slavery. Men get it now. They have adjusted and it is backfiring on women, so now the narrative is changing - but this transition away from marriage has just begun. The negative effects of feminism will last well into the next century. Such is the power of religion.
Also, Western Civilization is imperialist, racist, homophobic and all the other isms you people have claimed it is for decades. White men in particular have heard you on that too - and they are no longer feeding that system.
Also, Western Civilization is imperialist, racist, homophobic and all the other isms you people have claimed it is for decades. White men in particular have heard you on that too - and they are no longer feeding that system.
Shut the fuck up you retard, I've been here longer than you, and have been arguing against feminism longer than you. These are fucking reactionary positions at this point because Sociology professors teach the exact opposite of what I'm saying. Plenty of them have this crazy idea that restrictions on sex and breeding rights were invented by Capitalism.
And you are the one crying like a Leftist by saying "SOURCE????!!!"
The source is that it is the point of pair-bonding. Why is a woman supposed to cook and clean in a relationship? Because that way a man doesn't have to. He can work longer hours, harder, because he doesn't have to do the chores or cook for himself. In fact, that's actually the primary reason homosapiens invented cooking at all. Cooking food makes digestion of food extremely easy. Gorillas have giant pot-bellies because they actually need a vast amount of space and time to digest food for hours and hours. Meanwhile, humans can cook food, dramatically cut down on the time it takes for digestion, and can literally energize themselves faster as a species because of this. When you combine this with the fact that we are an endurance predator that has to literally run our prey to exhaustion, it means that every second saved counts. Women cooking food, cuts down on the workload and time that a man has to sacrifice to maintain himself. She will never run as fast or as far as him, is less resistant to damage, and is less resistant to psychological stress. That means he is monopolizing the agency of the pair-bond since he can make the most of it. She sacrifices her agency and has to take a rejuvenation roll to keep him hunting, fighting, or otherwise working.
Don't come at me with your stupid scripted response. There's no feminists here.
Well, you certainly do a good job of spewing their talking points.
Women maximize men's agency. REALLY?
Do you have any idea how utterly wrong this is - at every possible level. I can't even think of one way this make sense outside of some super passive dude who is miserable in his relationship with a boss bitch.
Also, you do know that name calling is a huge red flag when some teenager cannot back up their points with something reasonable. Right?
Have a good day bro. You are fighting your fight so don't give up.
But I guarantee you one thing with nearly 100% certainty - you WILL see this differently in the future.
FFS. Just. Please stop.
WHAAAT!
Where the hell did you find this nugget? Which sociology professor told you this steaming pill of hogwash. I am going to need to see proof of this. Source right now or your whole thread is suspect.
This is perhaps the most ignorant crap I have read here all week. Look sweetie, I know feminism is now telling you marriage is good. But for over half a century it has been telling women that marriage is slavery. Men get it now. They have adjusted and it is backfiring on women, so now the narrative is changing - but this transition away from marriage has just begun. The negative effects of feminism will last well into the next century. Such is the power of religion.
Also, Western Civilization is imperialist, racist, homophobic and all the other isms you people have claimed it is for decades. White men in particular have heard you on that too - and they are no longer feeding that system.
You're welcome.
Shut the fuck up you retard, I've been here longer than you, and have been arguing against feminism longer than you. These are fucking reactionary positions at this point because Sociology professors teach the exact opposite of what I'm saying. Plenty of them have this crazy idea that restrictions on sex and breeding rights were invented by Capitalism.
And you are the one crying like a Leftist by saying "SOURCE????!!!"
The source is that it is the point of pair-bonding. Why is a woman supposed to cook and clean in a relationship? Because that way a man doesn't have to. He can work longer hours, harder, because he doesn't have to do the chores or cook for himself. In fact, that's actually the primary reason homosapiens invented cooking at all. Cooking food makes digestion of food extremely easy. Gorillas have giant pot-bellies because they actually need a vast amount of space and time to digest food for hours and hours. Meanwhile, humans can cook food, dramatically cut down on the time it takes for digestion, and can literally energize themselves faster as a species because of this. When you combine this with the fact that we are an endurance predator that has to literally run our prey to exhaustion, it means that every second saved counts. Women cooking food, cuts down on the workload and time that a man has to sacrifice to maintain himself. She will never run as fast or as far as him, is less resistant to damage, and is less resistant to psychological stress. That means he is monopolizing the agency of the pair-bond since he can make the most of it. She sacrifices her agency and has to take a rejuvenation roll to keep him hunting, fighting, or otherwise working.
Don't come at me with your stupid scripted response. There's no feminists here.
You could have just said
REEEEEEEE!!!
Much more effective sweetie.
Well, you certainly do a good job of spewing their talking points.
Women maximize men's agency. REALLY?
Do you have any idea how utterly wrong this is - at every possible level. I can't even think of one way this make sense outside of some super passive dude who is miserable in his relationship with a boss bitch.
Also, you do know that name calling is a huge red flag when some teenager cannot back up their points with something reasonable. Right?
Have a good day bro. You are fighting your fight so don't give up.
But I guarantee you one thing with nearly 100% certainty - you WILL see this differently in the future.
Shut up, trash. You started the name calling, you get the name calling.