But Julie Bindel, the author of today’s essay, believes the verdict to be a win for abusers and misogynists everywhere. She has plenty of experience fighting both. — BW
Also, why do they call it the Free Press when they let pro-censorship Bindel have an opinion piece? Clever to put it behind a pay wall so only true believers will see her diatribe.
I really don't need to show evidence that a woman like her is pro false accusations.
But I will anyway, because you're a clown who deserves to be put back in the circus for a while.
Also, why do they call it the Free Press when they let pro-censorship Bindel have an opinion piece? Clever to put it behind a pay wall so only true believers will see her diatribe.
You really do, but you can't.
All you showed is that she doesn't believe that her accusations were false, not that she supports accusations when they are false.
What censorship does she advocate?
A court of law (not a UK clown court) determined that they were false. Supporting her is supporting lies.
She advocates for laws against "misogyny".
I do think they're lies, but she clearly doesn't think so.
Can you actually substantiate something for once?
It doesn't matter what she thinks. The court said they are.
Common sense. Sometimes people don't need to say things for their position to be obvious.