I think that it's fundamentally the nature of femininity as women pair-bond and compartmentalize themselves into maximized feminine form.
My argument is that when humans pair-bond they compartmentalize to their most masculine and feminine forms. In so doing, women maximize their femininity towards aesthetic and social navigation; where men maximize their masculinity towards agency and social hierarchy. Maximized agency requires long term time preference so that you can fulfil your potential agency into some action. However, aesthetics always exist in the moment and emphasize short-time preference.
A feminine society is utterly incapable of civilizational development because it never has the long-term time preference, and efficient use of agency, to build a complex and interwoven society. A woman can navigate that society, maybe even partly maintain it from a social ordering, but a woman can't create it from scratch.
However, women are kind of a glue for a civilization. Men will keep building new things with their agency, but will stop once they've solved some problem. Women tend to promote men to keep building with their agency to fulfill an aesthetic narrative, and foster a social order.
Men are like cutting wooden boards into pieces and shapes, but women are like glue. To build a civilization, (like a bird house), you'll need both. If you just have men (the wood), it will be a temporary structure. But if you just have women, you'll just have pile of glue.
I think that it's fundamentally the nature of femininity as women pair-bond and compartmentalize themselves into maximized feminine form.
My argument is that when humans pair-bond they compartmentalize to their most masculine and feminine forms. In so doing, women maximize their femininity towards aesthetic and social navigation; where men maximize their masculinity towards agency and social hierarchy. Maximized agency requires long term time preference so that you can fulfil your potential agency into some action. However, aesthetics always exist in the moment and emphasize short-time preference.
A feminine society is utterly incapable of civilizational development because it never has the long-term time preference, and efficient use of agency, to build a complex and interwoven society. A woman can navigate that society, maybe even partly maintain it from a social ordering, but a woman can't create it from scratch.
However, women are kind of a glue for a civilization. Men will keep building new things with their agency, but will stop once they've solved some problem. Women tend to promote men to keep building with their agency to fulfill an aesthetic narrative, and foster a social order.
Men are like cutting wooden boards into pieces and shapes, but women are like glue. To build a civilization, (like a bird house), you'll need both. If you just have men (the wood), it will be a temporary structure. But if you just have women, you'll just have pile of glue.