You seem to be confused about something. I'm not suggesting that the NYT are somehow heroes of the Right, they're still libtards.
I never said the NYT aren't being good libtards. I'm pointing out libtard infighting. Of COURSE it's better for the Left that the trannies get shut down. Of course the NYT wants to do what's best for the Left.
Up until now, the NYT and other bastions of libtard elites have refused to fight the trannies out of fear of being the 1st one into the breach and getting torn apart. The fact that the NYT published a feminist Op ed in direct conflict with the trannies is a watershed moment in the Left's tranny civil war between the trannies/intersectionals and the TERFs.
None of this is good for the Right except as entertainment. I never suggested that the people at the NYT are becoming right wing or would vote republican. Those things are impossible.
I never said the NYT aren't being good libtards. I'm pointing out libtard infighting. Of COURSE it's better for the Left that the trannies get shut down. Of course the NYT wants to do what's best for the Left.
So we want liberals to be less unreasonable so that when they do gain power, as inevitably they will (assuming I were to accept your ideas about 'democracy' and all that), so they'll do less damage, right?
The fact that the NYT published a feminist Op ed in direct conflict with the trannies is a watershed moment in the Left's tranny civil war between the trannies/intersectionals and the TERFs.
I also want the GC to win, because they are less crazy.
None of this is good for the Right except as entertainment. I never suggested that the people at the NYT are becoming right wing or would vote republican. Those things are impossible.
Sure, but I'm just saying that this may not be the defeat for the lobby. Make extreme demands, settle on a 'compromise' that is grossly skewed in your position, that is actually brilliant "strategery".
So we want liberals to be less unreasonable so that when they do gain power, as inevitably they will (assuming I were to accept your ideas about 'democracy' and all that), so they'll do less damage, right?
Yes, if liberals realize their ideas are unpopular so they back off, that is how democracy works to maintain balance and stability. Trump & BLM/Covid caused the libtards to get so worked up that they began to act against democracy by pushing too aggressively. They SHOULD have been dealt a punishing defeat in the 2022 election, but Trump saved them from that by promoting retard candidates who lost what should have been easy pickups.
Sure, but I'm just saying that this may not be the defeat for the lobby. Make extreme demands, settle on a 'compromise' that is grossly skewed in your position, that is actually brilliant "strategery".
Not in this case. This is about internal power struggles within the Left, and the radicals were indoctrinated to be uncompromising. The more radical the Democrats are, the more elections they will lose.
Yes, if liberals realize their ideas are unpopular so they back off, that is how democracy works to maintain balance and stability.
The only thing that matters is popularity among the elites. The troons had been good at intimidating the elites into silence, but now that more and more see their own children going down the drain of this idiocy, they become more critical. So yeah, that is how oligarchy works.
They SHOULD have been dealt a punishing defeat in the 2022 election, but Trump saved them from that by promoting retard candidates who lost what should have been easy pickups.
They weren't the only ones who lost though.
Not in this case. This is about internal power struggles within the Left, and the radicals were indoctrinated to be uncompromising. The more radical the Democrats are, the more elections they will lose.
As the Trump presidency showed, they continue pushing their agenda even when a nominal opponent is in power. That is because they control the bureaucracy.
The only thing that matters is popularity among the elites.
If elites push things too far out of step with the people, you get a backlash like you saw with Trump.
The troons had been good at intimidating the elites into silence, but now that more and more see their own children going down the drain of this idiocy, they become more critical. So yeah, that is how oligarchy works.
I see the troons as a weapon forged by the elites, especially the atheistic jew elites who often are the thought leaders of the Left. These leftist elites made their troon weapon and unleashed it, thinking it would aid in their destruction of American culture and society. However, the troons are now getting in the way of their mainstream control by shifting swing voters to the right, and are also engaging in a lot of friendly fire, so SOME of these elites have decided it's time to rein in their weapon.
They weren't the only ones who lost though.
I can't think of a single good candidate who lost. DeSantis absolutely crushed it in Florida. All the high profile losses were Trump-endorsed candidates who had a lot of flaws. These bad candidates dragged the whole side down, too, because the media could run nonstop headlines about how "ULTRA MAGA" the republican slate was.
they continue pushing their agenda even when a nominal opponent is in power. That is because they control the bureaucracy.
Yes and I've told you that fighting back against the long march through the institutions is a generational struggle. We currently have no easy answer to it. The eventual answer will be that we need to strip as much power away from the bureaucracy as possible so they lack opportunities to abuse it.
You seem to be confused about something. I'm not suggesting that the NYT are somehow heroes of the Right, they're still libtards.
I never said the NYT aren't being good libtards. I'm pointing out libtard infighting. Of COURSE it's better for the Left that the trannies get shut down. Of course the NYT wants to do what's best for the Left.
Up until now, the NYT and other bastions of libtard elites have refused to fight the trannies out of fear of being the 1st one into the breach and getting torn apart. The fact that the NYT published a feminist Op ed in direct conflict with the trannies is a watershed moment in the Left's tranny civil war between the trannies/intersectionals and the TERFs.
None of this is good for the Right except as entertainment. I never suggested that the people at the NYT are becoming right wing or would vote republican. Those things are impossible.
So we want liberals to be less unreasonable so that when they do gain power, as inevitably they will (assuming I were to accept your ideas about 'democracy' and all that), so they'll do less damage, right?
I also want the GC to win, because they are less crazy.
Sure, but I'm just saying that this may not be the defeat for the lobby. Make extreme demands, settle on a 'compromise' that is grossly skewed in your position, that is actually brilliant "strategery".
Yes, if liberals realize their ideas are unpopular so they back off, that is how democracy works to maintain balance and stability. Trump & BLM/Covid caused the libtards to get so worked up that they began to act against democracy by pushing too aggressively. They SHOULD have been dealt a punishing defeat in the 2022 election, but Trump saved them from that by promoting retard candidates who lost what should have been easy pickups.
Not in this case. This is about internal power struggles within the Left, and the radicals were indoctrinated to be uncompromising. The more radical the Democrats are, the more elections they will lose.
The only thing that matters is popularity among the elites. The troons had been good at intimidating the elites into silence, but now that more and more see their own children going down the drain of this idiocy, they become more critical. So yeah, that is how oligarchy works.
They weren't the only ones who lost though.
As the Trump presidency showed, they continue pushing their agenda even when a nominal opponent is in power. That is because they control the bureaucracy.
If elites push things too far out of step with the people, you get a backlash like you saw with Trump.
I see the troons as a weapon forged by the elites, especially the atheistic jew elites who often are the thought leaders of the Left. These leftist elites made their troon weapon and unleashed it, thinking it would aid in their destruction of American culture and society. However, the troons are now getting in the way of their mainstream control by shifting swing voters to the right, and are also engaging in a lot of friendly fire, so SOME of these elites have decided it's time to rein in their weapon.
I can't think of a single good candidate who lost. DeSantis absolutely crushed it in Florida. All the high profile losses were Trump-endorsed candidates who had a lot of flaws. These bad candidates dragged the whole side down, too, because the media could run nonstop headlines about how "ULTRA MAGA" the republican slate was.
Yes and I've told you that fighting back against the long march through the institutions is a generational struggle. We currently have no easy answer to it. The eventual answer will be that we need to strip as much power away from the bureaucracy as possible so they lack opportunities to abuse it.