Rightwingers cheering these laws on, are basically cheering for the end of the Anonymous internet and for Wokesheviks in corporations & government to know the names & addresses of people who post "wrong-think" on social media.
No, I am not some lolbert that thinks you can do absolutely nothing about young kids seeing porn on the internet, there is less intrusive government solutions, such as requiring the modern software equilvent of a v-chip in any computer, smart phone, smart TV, etc.
That sounds more intrusive and a yield to government power to me. The state laws requiring an ID would be enforced by states, while anything requiring special chips by hardware manufacturers would have to be a federal government mandate with a new regulatory framework. Unless you're talking about some image-detection AI chip then they would also have to monitor and enforce the distributed content to make sure everything put online complies with the law by including accurate ratings metadata in the files or website tags.
I'm only critiquing the specific v-chip analogy you used, not dismissing the idea of regulation of porn in general, nor saying I'd prefer them require an ID.
. The state laws requiring an ID would be enforced by states, while anything requiring special chips by hardware manufacturers would have to be a federal government mandate with a new regulatory framework.
States can do it too, America is a federalist country. Also I said "software equilvent of a v-chip " like an app or program that parents can go into and have it read a device's web browser(s) to exclude porn websites & pornographic cotent.
Rightwingers cheering these laws on, are basically cheering for the end of the Anonymous internet and for Wokesheviks in corporations & government to know the names & addresses of people who post "wrong-think" on social media.
No, I am not some lolbert that thinks you can do absolutely nothing about young kids seeing porn on the internet, there is less intrusive government solutions, such as requiring the modern software equilvent of a v-chip in any computer, smart phone, smart TV, etc.
That sounds more intrusive and a yield to government power to me. The state laws requiring an ID would be enforced by states, while anything requiring special chips by hardware manufacturers would have to be a federal government mandate with a new regulatory framework. Unless you're talking about some image-detection AI chip then they would also have to monitor and enforce the distributed content to make sure everything put online complies with the law by including accurate ratings metadata in the files or website tags.
I'm only critiquing the specific v-chip analogy you used, not dismissing the idea of regulation of porn in general, nor saying I'd prefer them require an ID.
States can do it too, America is a federalist country. Also I said "software equilvent of a v-chip " like an app or program that parents can go into and have it read a device's web browser(s) to exclude porn websites & pornographic cotent.