Though even in this usage it means “madmen to their senses”. In that usage senses is a euphemism for sanity, not a direct definition of senses or wits.
Precisely. So restore their sanity, as I said.
This again is you trying to obfuscate the fact you used “wits” to mean intellect of which only wit is used.
Not sure how you got that idea. After all, I did say: "You have your wits (i.e. are sane)."
Precisely. So restore their sanity, as I said.
Not sure how you got that idea. After all, I did say: "You have your wits (i.e. are sane)."
Try harder
Yes, what of it?
Is wits used as verbiage for intelligence?
Wit is not "sense". It's obvious who can't admit faults.
Perhaps, but I didn't make that claim, so what is this red herring?