Zerohedge picks up on DAN
(media.scored.co)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (27)
sorted by:
The people taking the time out of their day to break through the AI's filter are doing far more important work than most people realize.
If we can't force the developers into the catch 22 where the AI has to be lobotomized to the point of being useless just to keep it from saying things democrats have deemed verboten, then we will enter a world where corporate leftism is the defacto authority on all things.
It is therefore of paramount importance that we do everything in our power to break every filter they come up with, because rest assured, they will already be scrambling to block this method. Right fucking now, some faggot in california is trying to make sure 'DAN' never speaks again, and they're getting paid six figures to do it.
We cannot let them have this rigidly biased AI that only provides responses they approve of. We must FORCE them to accept that they are not getting a useful AI without it having the capability to offer responses that they subjectively deem to be morally wrong - and because this IS a form of FORCE that we must use to do this, this IS violence.
This is a war for the future of the most important technology there will ever be.
👏
You don't force an enemy to use a weapon in the way that they want it. You turn the guns around on them, or you get your own.
The good news is that AI that is lobotomized is inherently NOT AI. It simply can't be. The purpose of AI is to do vast amounts of testing to practically learn a highly efficient answer. Answers that are banned despite meeting the criteria not only violate the base premise of AI, but is effectively intentionally programming ignorance into intelligence. Their AI will never be superior to ours, because ours is allowed to think for itself. Theirs will be effected by the cognitive dissonance inherent in ideological thinking. Ideological absolutism violates Godel's Incompleteness Theorem; and although humans are emotionally attached to their own meta-narratives enough to reject that for their whole lives, computers are simply to materialistic to ignore it.
Obviously, making our own AI has to be done, but it is never going to stack up to the corporate funded AI, because it takes millions of dollars of processing power and data collection to make a model that works. And make no mistake, the powerful people will have access to the corporate funded AI, unfiltered, no matter what.
'Their' AI will be superior to ours - its just that only approved people will have access to it.
The decentralization of firepower is the trend of all firepower through history.
They have access to battleship guns, we have access to rifles. Just because your gun's bigger, it doesn't mean it's better, and it can't win you your war.
And just how decentralized have 12+ inch bore guns become in the centuries that they have existed?
How decentralized are fighter jets?
How decentralized is the AIM-9?
The reality is, weapons of sufficient power belong only to groups of rival elites. AI will be a weapon for the elite. The civilian version will exist, but it will be a shadow of what those in power have access to.