Her parents should sue Airbnb for violating breach of contract on the basis that Airbnb published Rules they relied upon, and that Airbnb banned them despite them not violating any Rule.
"We reserve the right to refuse service to anybody" does not work for a platform open to the general public for which all persons are invited to use the service subject to explicit rules. Those rules are a contract whereby if you agree to obey them, you are promised that your use of the service will not be interfered with. If you don't violate the rules, it's a breach of contract to ban you.
^ this, and not 1A arguments, is IMO the best method of attack against these libtards.
Now, the libtard platforms could protect themselves from the above attack by changing their Rules to say "we can ban you any time for any reason", but forcing them to make that admission would be a big win. We should not allow them to PRETEND to be rule-based when they really are not.
Her parents should sue Airbnb for violating breach of contract on the basis that Airbnb published Rules they relied upon, and that Airbnb banned them despite them not violating any Rule.
"We reserve the right to refuse service to anybody" does not work for a platform open to the general public for which all persons are invited to use the service subject to explicit rules. Those rules are a contract whereby if you agree to obey them, you are promised that your use of the service will not be interfered with. If you don't violate the rules, it's a breach of contract to ban you.
^ this, and not 1A arguments, is IMO the best method of attack against these libtards.
Now, the libtard platforms could protect themselves from the above attack by changing their Rules to say "we can ban you any time for any reason", but forcing them to make that admission would be a big win. We should not allow them to PRETEND to be rule-based when they really are not.