Since 2016, more and more people are becoming skeptical of the "narrative" yet the reality is that the major institutions still have massive power.
People not trusting them sadly doesn't mean much when they have the backing of almost all major organizations in the public and private sectors.
I think less people will comply with authoritarian demands in the next "pandemic" especially in red states like Florida/Texas but I fear that in the face of widespread peaceful non compliance the powers that be will resort to using forceful hard power to clamp down on all dissent.
True there's a mountain to climb and the chance of things going brutal, but I genuinely think if 2016 didn't happen the way it did, more people would've complied with lockdowns, vaccines and boosters, trans and racebaiting compared to now.
I think you're right but for other reasons, they were tools they had but last option tools like nukes.
Without 2016 they wouldn't have needed a pandemic but even though they won 2020 it's been pyrrhic for them as now there is more distrust of healthcare and doctors in general.
All of these were attempts to be where their original plan was meant to go but I think that's off the table now so it's more a question of if they are looking to duck out without the responsibility of cleaning up or going to thrash and scratch like a dying animal in a trap.
Since 2016, more and more people are becoming skeptical of the "narrative" yet the reality is that the major institutions still have massive power.
People not trusting them sadly doesn't mean much when they have the backing of almost all major organizations in the public and private sectors.
I think less people will comply with authoritarian demands in the next "pandemic" especially in red states like Florida/Texas but I fear that in the face of widespread peaceful non compliance the powers that be will resort to using forceful hard power to clamp down on all dissent.
True there's a mountain to climb and the chance of things going brutal, but I genuinely think if 2016 didn't happen the way it did, more people would've complied with lockdowns, vaccines and boosters, trans and racebaiting compared to now.
I think if 2016 went the other way there would have been no pandemic at all in 2020 as they would not need it.
The pandemic was perfect for them because it destroyed the economy and cemented mail in voting. It was exactly what they needed to win 2020.
I think they would have only focused on race baiting and pushing gender ideology in the timeline where 2016 never happened.
I think you're right but for other reasons, they were tools they had but last option tools like nukes.
Without 2016 they wouldn't have needed a pandemic but even though they won 2020 it's been pyrrhic for them as now there is more distrust of healthcare and doctors in general.
All of these were attempts to be where their original plan was meant to go but I think that's off the table now so it's more a question of if they are looking to duck out without the responsibility of cleaning up or going to thrash and scratch like a dying animal in a trap.