All evidence actually needs to have a person attached to it. A document isn't a document, it's a document that someone had to pick up, that someone made, that someone interpreted. Everyone involved with that evidence can be dragged into court.
So okay, you've got a video that you want to sneak in that's actually AI generated. Well, how did you get it, the court needs to know that. It needs to be submitted long before the trial begins. You have to share it with the defense. Who can vouch for the video's authenticity, they can be subject to cross-examination. Who received the video evidence, they can be subject to cross-examination. Can you have an expert witness testify that this is genuine footage? They can be subject to cross and the other side can get their own experts involved. That also means that they need access to your copy of the footage so it can be examined.
To be honest, the worst thing about our court system is that it could totally work if: a) judges actually followed the law, b) prosecutors didn't have so much undue power.
No, because that's not how courts work.
While there are always dirty prosecutors like FlufferBoy2000 that try to pull in evidence that has no one to speak for it, you can't actually do that. If you remember that was when ADA Kraus in the Rittenhouse case was given drone footage by an anonymous source from at 3 AM a few days before trial, from a footage of a drone company, that seemed to have been a shell company that only existed for a few weeks and managed to entirely disappear, and gave Fox News completely different footage, and the prosecutors lied about the footage they shared with the defense.
All evidence actually needs to have a person attached to it. A document isn't a document, it's a document that someone had to pick up, that someone made, that someone interpreted. Everyone involved with that evidence can be dragged into court.
Here's Judge "Badass" Borowski explaining to a race-grifter that you can't just randomly take screenshots, say they are publicly available, and then use that as evidence. You need to have a person authenticate it and lay foundation for it for the court to proceed with it.
So okay, you've got a video that you want to sneak in that's actually AI generated. Well, how did you get it, the court needs to know that. It needs to be submitted long before the trial begins. You have to share it with the defense. Who can vouch for the video's authenticity, they can be subject to cross-examination. Who received the video evidence, they can be subject to cross-examination. Can you have an expert witness testify that this is genuine footage? They can be subject to cross and the other side can get their own experts involved. That also means that they need access to your copy of the footage so it can be examined.
To be honest, the worst thing about our court system is that it could totally work if: a) judges actually followed the law, b) prosecutors didn't have so much undue power.