I still don't get why supposedly intelligent people accepted this particular lie.

I mean, we vaccinate against the measles because they can be really nasty if things go wrong, especially long term. And because, while we know that the vax isn't perfect it's still a viable alternative statistically.

But no one that has even a modicum of knowledge would suggest that someone that was vaccinated against measles has a higher future immunity than someone that lived through an actual infection.

Yet here we are, believing corporations that have an interest in selling us something, telling us that their product can do something they have no way of knowing whatsoever and having fucking authorities parroting these lies. And all of them are still alive and free.

Iwasaki referred to a British preprint study, soon after published in Nature, that concluded, based on survey data, that the protection from the Pfizer and AstraZeneca vaccines was heightened among people with evidence of prior infection. She also noted a study she worked on that found the naturally immune had higher antibody titers than the vaccinated, but that the vaccinated “reached comparable levels of neutralization responses to the ancestral strain after the second vaccine dose.” The researchers also discovered T cells—thought to protect against severe illness—were boosted by vaccination.

Why is it always a woman? Seriously. This whole "male genocide conspiracy" people say I have would be truly tinfoil if they didn't constantly pull this incestuous circlejerk, where they reference their own studies, published in woman-run journals, to determine that we need to take poison that's destroying our hearts.