This is a bit of a shower thought, but I'm wondering if all the polytard nonsense that's been pushed over the last few years is the even more degenerate dark side of female hypergamy. We know that the vast majority of women are only interested in a tiny portion of men (the top of the top of the top on the SMV pecking order). It's often referred to as the 80/20 rule (80% of women going for 20% of men), but there's evidence that it's more like the top 5% (source). Whatever the exact numbers, the point remains the same: This leaves a ton of leftover men, and a much smaller number of women who are disgustingly low value, even by current year's nasty standards. Those women might consider 7s, 6s, and possibly 5s to be on their level instead of 9s and 10s, but they still have a ridiculously overinflated perception of their SMV.
The main response society has to this problem is to sweep it under the rug and expect men to continue playing the sick game or rot in a ditch if they can't/won't. But a secondary response appears to be promoting polyamory. In a certain sense that's already happening organically with the women and top men (think a de facto form of polygyny). The setup isn't officially a relationship and frankly Chad Thundercock doesn't need to seek progressive validation of his lifestyle so they don't use that term, but that's what it is in practice. That's not what the degenerate media is promoting, however. A man with multiple women is a crime against feminism. They don't criticize women who participate in those setups because criticizing women's shitty taste in men is an even worse crime against feminism. Still, they don't approve of it and won't promote it. They're promoting nasty ass women with a cuck harem of low value males. I even once read an article promoting polyamory as a solution to the incel problem (I lost it and can't find it unfortunately). Now, polytards will tell you that there's a million different ways that polyamory can be structured. While that's true, the most common structure by far (outside the cock carousel that is) is the cuck harem. The media is eager to promote cuckoldry of course (example), and I sort of wonder if their goal is to get non-Chads to share bottom of the barrel women. Using the (optimistic) 80/20 numbers as an example, that's 4 non-Chads for every nasty woman who can't get Chad or Tyrone to bang her even in a dry spell. I think the cuckoldry aspect is enough for the elites to favor it, and it allows them to victim blame incels for being unwilling to share a disgusting woman with 3 other dudes. "Hey, polyamory is option for them. They obviously don't want sex as bad as they want to be misogynistic monogamists". I'm curious to know what people here think. It's kind of a half baked theory of mine that popped into my head a few days ago.
Polyamory is the default for humans. As seen in tribes, societies and cultures pre-civilisation. There would be a leader of the tribe whom would have virtually all the children, a second in command who may have one or two children and the rest of the men have nothing. As seen in scientific studies in tribes to this day. Children were raised by all the women and the "leftover men" had a powerful incentive to not disrupt the hierarchy or attempt to mate because the punishment would be either death by direct means or being cast out of the tribe and left to fend for themselves, where they would become prey.
It's one of the reasons, but a critical historical one, of why 80% of women have passed on their genes but only 40% of men have.
Once we moved forward to civilisation and society, we realised that having a lot of men without partners would be disastrous for society so we implemented enforced monogamy to ensure as close a 1:1 ratio of men to women so that these men were incentivised to work and contribute to society.
This worked until the 1960s when cue the birth control pill, liberation and technological changes which removed the consequence of pregnancy came about and we've seen a shift in terms of attitudes to dating and relationships. And it's accelerated in the last decade since the introduction of dating websites and dating apps, particularly Tinder but also Plenty Of Fish before it which removes the last remaining social stigmas and public shaming of casual hook-ups and multi-dating as this can be kept anonymous from your peers and community.
I did see a video where a psychologist stated that twenty percent of women are in a polygamous relationship, whether they were aware of it or not. That was an eye opener when I heard it.
But in terms of the "bottom of the barrel women" you describe, the anecdotal evidence I have seen is that they value themselves much higher. We see this in studies around height. Shorter women seek much taller men compared to average height women. In order to compensate. I posit that women do the same thing in terms of attractiveness. They will also not settle for anything lower than their social status (what is known as hypergamy), preferring to go it alone with single motherhood, adopting a pet or even I am starting to see same-sex relationships rather than "settle" for a "non-Chad". Worse still, for advocates of "the wall", I have also seen anecdotal evidence that women in their fifties can get a lot of attention from men if they actively put themselves out there into the dating market. This is in stark contrast to the claims that as soon as a woman hits their thirties, its over and its singledom forever. That doesn't seem to tally with what is being seen in reality.
The solution to the "incel problem" is not going to be polyamory or state sanctioned girlfriends. It will be either criminalisation or blacklisting via social credit of anyone who is failing to attract a partner via their behaviour and status. As we are starting to see in the UK.