The way I look at it is the money is either going to a real woman or a man pretending to be a real woman. At least if the money is going to me, it's not going to a woman so it's a net win for the male community.
Fair point. I guess it's just a morality thing. It's like how I won't invest in companies that are morally wrong, even if it's easy profits. (morally wrong = feminist. I'm comfortable with cigarettes and alcohol investment)
You've got to switch your mindset around a little IMO.
The problem is when you invest in a feminist company, you may be profiting, yes, but you're also aiding the feminist company because you're increasing the demand for their stock. Sure, you mean nothing and you aren't going to change the price but you are essentially supporting that feminist company.
The difference with say creating a fake woman and selling it to simps is that you're now directly hurting women by replacing them. The men are going to lose the same either way but now women don't profit.
Unlike with investing in feminist companies, my idea of profiting off simps actually hurts women instead of helps them. That to me makes it morally more on the "good" side of things. Sure, ideally, we'd make simping illegal and imprison women who exploit simps but we're not there yet so at least I'm hurting the profit of women who exploit simps.
I saw it somewhere other than Twitter, but it was probably the same thing.
Wouldn't you feel bad about ripping off your fellow man? I couldn't do it.
The way I look at it is the money is either going to a real woman or a man pretending to be a real woman. At least if the money is going to me, it's not going to a woman so it's a net win for the male community.
Fair point. I guess it's just a morality thing. It's like how I won't invest in companies that are morally wrong, even if it's easy profits. (morally wrong = feminist. I'm comfortable with cigarettes and alcohol investment)
You've got to switch your mindset around a little IMO.
The problem is when you invest in a feminist company, you may be profiting, yes, but you're also aiding the feminist company because you're increasing the demand for their stock. Sure, you mean nothing and you aren't going to change the price but you are essentially supporting that feminist company.
The difference with say creating a fake woman and selling it to simps is that you're now directly hurting women by replacing them. The men are going to lose the same either way but now women don't profit.
Unlike with investing in feminist companies, my idea of profiting off simps actually hurts women instead of helps them. That to me makes it morally more on the "good" side of things. Sure, ideally, we'd make simping illegal and imprison women who exploit simps but we're not there yet so at least I'm hurting the profit of women who exploit simps.
Why did you get instantly downvoted?
I see your point, but honestly I'll keep pushing for the women doing it to be punished rather than trying to out grift the grifters.