I don't doubt there number of "dateable women" is only a fraction of the population of a city, but your calculation makes the assumption that these factors are independent (i.e. there is no correlation between them), when it is unlikely to be the case.
You're not wrong but I actually specifically chose things that aren't very correlated.
Yes, overweight comes down with age so the 70% is high, it's probably closer to 60% for that age bracket but I didn't bother to be highly accurate.
Also, non white women tend to be fatter so that 75% for similar race/culture preference might be too low given how we're factoring in non-fat people.
However, for percentage of single women who weren't mothers, I used the appropriate age category but again, probably more non-white single mothers.
For disabled women for example, I also used the appropriate age category; however, it's likely that more overweight women are disabled but it's also likely that most disabled women are single which skews the single women data so overall it might be a wash. Might be more white disabled though because we likely wouldn't let in immigrant disabled but it's likely not a huge difference.
I understand what you're saying, I'm just saying even when you calculate how everything interacts with one another, the number I came to is close enough. It's not much better than that.
We didn't even factor in looks besides weight, personality or anything. The numbers really are this bad.
I don't doubt there number of "dateable women" is only a fraction of the population of a city, but your calculation makes the assumption that these factors are independent (i.e. there is no correlation between them), when it is unlikely to be the case.
You're not wrong but I actually specifically chose things that aren't very correlated.
Yes, overweight comes down with age so the 70% is high, it's probably closer to 60% for that age bracket but I didn't bother to be highly accurate.
Also, non white women tend to be fatter so that 75% for similar race/culture preference might be too low given how we're factoring in non-fat people.
However, for percentage of single women who weren't mothers, I used the appropriate age category but again, probably more non-white single mothers.
For disabled women for example, I also used the appropriate age category; however, it's likely that more overweight women are disabled but it's also likely that most disabled women are single which skews the single women data so overall it might be a wash. Might be more white disabled though because we likely wouldn't let in immigrant disabled but it's likely not a huge difference.
I understand what you're saying, I'm just saying even when you calculate how everything interacts with one another, the number I came to is close enough. It's not much better than that.
We didn't even factor in looks besides weight, personality or anything. The numbers really are this bad.