Sorry, he should have been allowed to burn it. If they have the right to burn others, he should have that same right. It's really shows a bias there that shouldn't exist. I have no problem with Jews but free speech is a greater than religion in my mind, because it actually protects religion though most are to blind to see that.
Nobody in the government is denying him that right, problem is, the police can't protect him from the jewish banking cartel and fake news media harassment. A Muslim riot is easier to control because they show up, throw some rocks, then they go home.
Just a bystander, but why are those things one and the same in your opinion? He can burn the Torah, he just can’t stop the banks from deplatforming him if he does so, if he doesn’t get the police protection. He never needed permission, just protection, but I want to understand why both of those thing are the same in your eyes.
Sorry, he should have been allowed to burn it. If they have the right to burn others, he should have that same right. It's really shows a bias there that shouldn't exist. I have no problem with Jews but free speech is a greater than religion in my mind, because it actually protects religion though most are to blind to see that.
Nobody in the government is denying him that right, problem is, the police can't protect him from the jewish banking cartel and fake news media harassment. A Muslim riot is easier to control because they show up, throw some rocks, then they go home.
Just a bystander, but why are those things one and the same in your opinion? He can burn the Torah, he just can’t stop the banks from deplatforming him if he does so, if he doesn’t get the police protection. He never needed permission, just protection, but I want to understand why both of those thing are the same in your eyes.