The Hill is worried how many men are rejecting starting a family in favor of living a good life.
(media.communities.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (55)
sorted by:
These things keep women working. That's what they are for.
Family life only generates profits via consumption. If you spend time with your family, you aren't working, and single people also do a ton of consumer spending. Childless people are also just long term renters. When you die, all your shit just goes back into the system. You aren't keeping anything away from banks. I would have a tiny bit more respect for this MGTOW-ish thing that you want to do if you actually had an inkling of a plan to keep the wealth your brag about accumulating out of the system, but you clowns don't even realize that this is a problem.
Imagine bragging about funding feminism.
Banks only make profit when people are in debt. You can spend $1,000,000 and pay it off, the bank won't make a dime.
Write into your will that everything goes to Project Veritas then.
Who said I own the likes of Citigroup, BNP Paribas, Toronto Dominion etc. I check they don't do gender quota loans before investing.
There is also the whole investment thing you are overlooking. Also, the money you spend goes to business and is helping them payoff debt.
That's just it. You guys don't even seem to talk about this stuff or be aware of it. It's on people who disagree with your world view to point it out. If any of you were serious activists you would be trying to find ways to keep this wealth that you brag about hoarding away from the system.
Gender quota loans are only one specific feminist activity. If you are investing in anything big, I guarantee it's funding feminism (or tradcon but less likely) somewhere through political donations, so-called charity, etc. It might be six-degrees removed, but it will be there.
That's why you do boycotts. I made a list, as you should know because I've posted it here after every major change to it. Past direct funding, your options to block money going to the wrong places are very limited - at least if you want to keep your sanity.
I can't really speak for them but I believe the key thing is...MGTOW doesn't want to be a movement, or a political affiliation. It's just a loose gathering of people who oppose the way women treat men in modern society. As such, things like strategic will planning are not going to be part of what they do.
Probably true, but I can only call out what I directly see. Playing six degrees of the Kering Foundation is interesting, but not really helpful. Interestingly, you can get to practically any company through the Kering Foundation.
Here's an example :
Kering Foundation (receives donations from) Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (which owns stock in) Berkshire Hathaway (which is owned by) Warren Buffett (who owns stock in) American Express.
There's a more relevant one to this site though.
Kering Foundation (is owned by) Francois Pinault (who owns a share of) Puma (which is the official apparel company for) the Italian national football team (which is sponsored by) Telecom Italia (which is partially owned by) Vivendi (which is the parent company of) Ubisoft.
Although this latter chain will be broken in a few months because Italy is switching to Adidas.
Do you live in a shack in the woods? Do you grow your own food? Are you pirating your internet access? No? Then you are funding feminism.
Do you? That's the question.