"If you are white enough not to qualify for a DIE initiative, you are white enough for white nationalism." -Once again, your logic could apply to white Americans.
That is a pinprick compared to what Jews have suffered. I know, it's nothing, and probably deserved, right?
Their history is no more shared than "diaspora" whites. American Jews are also very secular yet that doesn't stop you from justifying their idpol orgs like the Republican Jewish Coalition.
I'd like to see them getting Jews to vote for Republicans. Is that bad?
You still aren't fleshing this out. "America has nothing to defend therefore..." what? We should just be apolitical nihilist? Are you unaware that people live here?
No, that's fair enough. It's just that I think that comparing America to France is ill-founded. Tell me what you do want to defend, and how being a white nationalist does that. I still don't understand why importing all of Europe's SJWs and keeping out blacks who are decent people will do that.
Judaism is based around ancestry
It isn't though. Theoretically, it is, but obviously there was no such person as Abraham. Like tribes, the idea of ancestry is purely notional, as a way to craft some sort of unity among disparate people.
You have been arguing throughout this thread that, for all intents and purposes, that America is a "melting pot" and a "nation of immigrants." While you haven't said those specific phrases, you are saying the same thing using different language. You are promoting the premises used to justify mass immigration.
Let's compare the US to France. Do you see a difference in historical attitude towards immigration? I'm not sure why you are so paranoid about my stance on immigration. I think it's bad, but historically, there was a lot of it in the US. Which doesn't mean you have to continue it! What is so hard about that?
Are you fucking serious? LMAO. That's not even close to an argument.
I agree. I hate such arguments. That is why a sentence followed in which I explained what is different, and how that is relevant to my point.
"It's gone to hell, but we can't, under any circumstances adopt pre-hellworld immigration laws." -what a joke
No, I just don't understand what you are trying to 'preserve'. A country in which you don't get monoclonals because you are too white? Seriously.
That is a pinprick compared to what Jews have suffered. I know, it's nothing, and probably deserved, right?
I'd like to see them getting Jews to vote for Republicans. Is that bad?
No, that's fair enough. It's just that I think that comparing America to France is ill-founded. Tell me what you do want to defend, and how being a white nationalist does that. I still don't understand why importing all of Europe's SJWs and keeping out blacks who are decent people will do that.
It isn't though. Theoretically, it is, but obviously there was no such person as Abraham. Like tribes, the idea of ancestry is purely notional, as a way to craft some sort of unity among disparate people.
Let's compare the US to France. Do you see a difference in historical attitude towards immigration? I'm not sure why you are so paranoid about my stance on immigration. I think it's bad, but historically, there was a lot of it in the US. Which doesn't mean you have to continue it! What is so hard about that?
I agree. I hate such arguments. That is why a sentence followed in which I explained what is different, and how that is relevant to my point.
No, I just don't understand what you are trying to 'preserve'. A country in which you don't get monoclonals because you are too white? Seriously.