Steven Crowder responds to Daily Wire: It was never about the money
(www.youtube.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (113)
sorted by:
Additionally.... That's perpetual rights to Louder With Crowder, but IANAL. Elsewhere in the thread, you're regurgitating superficial fanboy arguments like 'hur-dur, Kapernick' so do the needful and expunge 'parroting' from your vocabulary.
Crowder also brought it up in the phone call, regarding up-and-coming talent; Boreing's hesitant, standoffish response was telling.
"Crowder also brought it up in the phone call..."
You mean the phone call that he knew he was recording and that he knew he'd play for the public? Are you telling me you're so gullible that you'd believe anything he said on that call that he knew he'd play for the public? What up-and-coming talent? That's the biggest virtue-signal I've probably ever heard and that includes virtue-signaling Liberals. Crowder doesn't give a rat's ass about up-and-coming talent.
And your YouTube link shows Crowder explaining that DW retains Crowder's content DURING the contract period. Christ Almighty, how can you people keep repeating the same nonsensical falsehood that they retain all his content in perpetuity AFTER the contract period? Look at 'b", under "Additional Rights", when Crowder shows it on the screen (the exact time stamp that you linked). It says "DURING THE TERM."
And the Kaepernick argument wasn't superficial. It was about as damning as you could possibly get. Simply dismissing it as superficial is a classic Liberal tactic. But seeing as so many Crowder fanboys are actually closet Socialists, that now favor workers over the people that build companies, it's apropos.
That's the email-list you turd. Go one section down, where it says "additionally, [blank] will have perpetual and exclusive rights...". You're so willfully illiterate that you've apparently never came across the 'IANAL' acronym, instead clinging to a factionalist train-of-thought. And, the fucking irony of using a leftist (or tradcuck boomer) social construct in the same sentence of accusing of others of being commies.
Go find an aspie to detail how Crowder's situation isn't comparable to Kapernick's.
"Go one section down."
I did. It said the exact same fucking thing about it being DURING THE TERM! I feel like I'm picking on a retarded kid. Dumbass, they don't own any of his content AFTER the contract is over. Got it? The "perpetual and exclusive rights" are to whatever DAILY WIRE produces DURING the contract period! If Crowder produces it, HE OWNS THE CONTENT, including whatever he made BEFORE the contract!
You people will create straw man after straw man to rationalize this brain-dead take. It's just baffling that there could be anyone this stupid.
And yes, Crowder calling millions of dollars "slave wages" just like Kaepernick did, is EXACTLY THE SAME! Have an adult explain it to you. This sub used to have some intelligent people on it years ago when it was on Reddit, but now it's just filled with many of the same moronic millennials whose sole existence is predicated on "upvotes" and Reddit coins.
Here's the thing. The "C. Social Media Management: ..." section is vague, and without an active license to practice law and track record, you are not qualified to just assert what it means without extensive explanation or sources. I made that distinction towards myself in my first comment responding to you, but you were too interested in ramrodding hostile argumentation to have caught that; or even come across that shorthand before.
The vagueness in that term (and probably elsewhere in the full contract) is what's predatory to up-and-coming talent in creative industries. Boreing's preferred business M.O. is appropriate to catch unsavvy, dysfunctional corporations and govt. bureaucracies and net yourself a hefty profit
I'm done until you extrapolate either of the two side arguments I didn't spell out for you.