Steven Crowder responds to Daily Wire: It was never about the money
(www.youtube.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (113)
sorted by:
Here's the thing. The "C. Social Media Management: ..." section is vague, and without an active license to practice law and track record, you are not qualified to just assert what it means without extensive explanation or sources. I made that distinction towards myself in my first comment responding to you, but you were too interested in ramrodding hostile argumentation to have caught that; or even come across that shorthand before.
The vagueness in that term (and probably elsewhere in the full contract) is what's predatory to up-and-coming talent in creative industries. Boreing's preferred business M.O. is appropriate to catch unsavvy, dysfunctional corporations and govt. bureaucracies and net yourself a hefty profit
I'm done until you extrapolate either of the two side arguments I didn't spell out for you.
No, there is no "thing." The fact that you keep trying to rationalize your obviously false position means you're either trolling or mentally retarded in some way.
"...You are not qualified to just assert what it means without extensive explanation or sources."
I'm not as ASE-certified mechanic but I know what a flat tire looks like. There's no vagueness in any of the terms. They're very specific and detailed. What's more, is that Jeremy Boreing himself said on his response video that all of Crowder's content, social media accounts, merchandise, go back to Crowder AFTER THE CONTRACT PERIOD!!!! Got it? Do you need a more definitive SOURCE than the CEO of the Daily Wire literally saying out loud that everything ever produced by Crowder, even stuff Crowder produces himself DURING the contract period, belongs to Crowder AFTER the contract period. If Daily Wire produces it, they keep it. Are you not bright enough to understand that Not Gay Jared Owen Benjamin and Sven Computer didn't get to keep any of the content they were involved in after they left LWC or are you just trolling?
There's no vagueness and nothing deceptive. Any up-and-coming talent that isn't smart enough to hire a contract lawyer to pore over a contract, deserves to be taken for everything he has. Enough with the goddamn participation trophies and holding everyone's hand. If you're so dumb that you sign a contract that you don't understand, you deserve to be fleeced.
In another comment thread, I already addressed your last paragraph, but you skipped over it since some of the responses were a better fit for your vitriolic habits. I'm still waiting to see if you're capable of extrapolating the 2 side-arguments I left 10 days ago, which were in response to 2 ridiculous points you made.
"In another comment thread...."
So I'm supposed to sift through multiple hundreds of posts to find one more of your moronic posts in which you're wrong (verifiably so) for the umpteenth time. No thanks. Rather than being a passive-aggressive child, why don't you copy/paste the argument to this post so I can destroy, once again, whatever nonsense you used to rationalize why you're wrong about everything.
Once again you didn't extrapolate; "you skipped over it" meant you participated in said thread, but with multiple participants you decided to force hostile arguments.