The fake placebos mention is very interesting. The safety aluminum adjuvants used in vaccines seems to be debated, or at least was debated before wrong think could cost you your job. So why in the heck would they use them in the placebo, and does Malone point to any justification offered by Pharma? I know what he's implying.
And I've realized that vaccines touch upon a topic I find fascinating: complexity. I don't think these researchers have a clue. I mean it, and I've come to believe that biological systems are far beyond our current understanding. For every advance in knowledge two questions arise, and I think our ability to tinker has far exceeded our mechanistic understanding.
It would be like handing Newton a motherboard and giving him a year to figure it out. Sure he'd make progress, but he wouldn't be building a graphics card when his time was up. Now make the problem a million time more complex and people die every misstep you take. I'm beginning to think that the whole "medical trial" thing is a workaround for unethical behavior.
It would be like handing Newton a motherboard and giving him a year to figure it out. Sure he'd make progress, but he wouldn't be building a graphics card when his time was up. Now make the problem a million time more complex and people die every misstep you take. I'm beginning to think that the whole "medical trial" thing is a workaround for unethical behavior.
Congratulations, you just accurately described how difficult it is to modify genomic data. Such as via MRNA.
All it takes is a single pair swap to go wrong and you can cause an absolute cascade of failures. And the more confusing part of it, is that swapping out that very same pair in a different person, can lead to a different result.
Honestly DNA is a lot like a form of extremely advanced computer code. However unlike computer code, which you can generally just access via a terminal, you have to go through so many hoops to be able to tweak DNA in general, that doing so accurately and consistently is extremely difficult.
The safety aluminum adjuvants used in vaccines seems to be debated
Yeah, that was one thing that kind of stood out to me too -- it seems that their data shows that, in addition to the 'vaccines' being dangerous, maybe the delivery solutions themselves are also dangerous.
And I've realized that vaccines touch upon a topic I find fascinating: complexity. I don't think these researchers have a clue. I mean it, and I've come to believe that biological systems are far beyond our current understanding.
I had this exact discussion with a friend of mine who received his PhD in Microbiology from Notre Dame. As a software dev, I know how difficult it is to put together a functioning system even when all of the pieces are deterministic and specifically designed -- by humans -- to work with each other.
I'll believe that these wanna-be-organic-programmers know what they're doing when they can design a brand new organism from scratch, give it the exact life cycle that they want, get it to reproduce on its own, and get its offspring to reproduce on their own. I'll believe that they know how mammals work when they can design their own mammal out of ACTG molecules -- not a bunch of frankensteined chunks spliced together.
So why in the heck would they use them in the placebo,
Because they can say that they're solely testing the safety of the vaccine itself by comparing the delta of aluminum adjuvant versus vaccine + aluminum adjuvant. And then they can declare victory when the safety delta is small. When in reality, a comparison between saline versus aluminum adjuvant versus vaccine + aluminum adjuvant would probably show a much higher injury differential when comparing saline against either of the other options.
And I've realized that vaccines touch upon a topic I find fascinating: complexity.
Dr. Weinstein, who is a biologist by trade, brings up the idea that biology is the study of complex systems all the time on his podcast.
The fake placebos mention is very interesting. The safety aluminum adjuvants used in vaccines seems to be debated, or at least was debated before wrong think could cost you your job. So why in the heck would they use them in the placebo, and does Malone point to any justification offered by Pharma? I know what he's implying.
And I've realized that vaccines touch upon a topic I find fascinating: complexity. I don't think these researchers have a clue. I mean it, and I've come to believe that biological systems are far beyond our current understanding. For every advance in knowledge two questions arise, and I think our ability to tinker has far exceeded our mechanistic understanding.
It would be like handing Newton a motherboard and giving him a year to figure it out. Sure he'd make progress, but he wouldn't be building a graphics card when his time was up. Now make the problem a million time more complex and people die every misstep you take. I'm beginning to think that the whole "medical trial" thing is a workaround for unethical behavior.
Congratulations, you just accurately described how difficult it is to modify genomic data. Such as via MRNA.
All it takes is a single pair swap to go wrong and you can cause an absolute cascade of failures. And the more confusing part of it, is that swapping out that very same pair in a different person, can lead to a different result.
Honestly DNA is a lot like a form of extremely advanced computer code. However unlike computer code, which you can generally just access via a terminal, you have to go through so many hoops to be able to tweak DNA in general, that doing so accurately and consistently is extremely difficult.
Yeah, that was one thing that kind of stood out to me too -- it seems that their data shows that, in addition to the 'vaccines' being dangerous, maybe the delivery solutions themselves are also dangerous.
I had this exact discussion with a friend of mine who received his PhD in Microbiology from Notre Dame. As a software dev, I know how difficult it is to put together a functioning system even when all of the pieces are deterministic and specifically designed -- by humans -- to work with each other.
I'll believe that these wanna-be-organic-programmers know what they're doing when they can design a brand new organism from scratch, give it the exact life cycle that they want, get it to reproduce on its own, and get its offspring to reproduce on their own. I'll believe that they know how mammals work when they can design their own mammal out of ACTG molecules -- not a bunch of frankensteined chunks spliced together.
Because they can say that they're solely testing the safety of the vaccine itself by comparing the delta of aluminum adjuvant versus vaccine + aluminum adjuvant. And then they can declare victory when the safety delta is small. When in reality, a comparison between saline versus aluminum adjuvant versus vaccine + aluminum adjuvant would probably show a much higher injury differential when comparing saline against either of the other options.
Dr. Weinstein, who is a biologist by trade, brings up the idea that biology is the study of complex systems all the time on his podcast.