That's the reason given for the perma ban I have from the MensRights subreddit.
Some months back there was a discussion going about female on male domestic abuse and I believe the topic of throwing boiling water from a pan came up. While this is obviously something that can cause significant injury it's even worse when it's boiling syrup because the melting sugar sticks to skin, effectively creating something akin to napalm.
Which I mentioned in the thread.
By referencing an even earlier thread that still existed on the subreddit at the time of my post... 🙄
It could very well have been removed by this point but I don't afford Reddit mods much insight to their own actions.
They won't. That's something I found regarding thier policing of "violent speech".
Any mention of civilian casualties, or any descriptions of violence that involves violent or emotional imagery is considered "violent speech". They don't even investigate it. This originally came up early last year when someone described an action done to civilian casualties in the Ukraine War, and claimed that US politicians didn't care about them. I think that warranted a 3 day ban.
Suddenly it started happening to anyone who described a violent incident. Shit like "He was murdered" didn't get a removal, but "He was shot in the face, and chunks of his brain matter flew out", was removed.
That's the reason given for the perma ban I have from the MensRights subreddit.
Some months back there was a discussion going about female on male domestic abuse and I believe the topic of throwing boiling water from a pan came up. While this is obviously something that can cause significant injury it's even worse when it's boiling syrup because the melting sugar sticks to skin, effectively creating something akin to napalm.
Which I mentioned in the thread.
By referencing an even earlier thread that still existed on the subreddit at the time of my post... 🙄
It could very well have been removed by this point but I don't afford Reddit mods much insight to their own actions.
They won't. That's something I found regarding thier policing of "violent speech".
Any mention of civilian casualties, or any descriptions of violence that involves violent or emotional imagery is considered "violent speech". They don't even investigate it. This originally came up early last year when someone described an action done to civilian casualties in the Ukraine War, and claimed that US politicians didn't care about them. I think that warranted a 3 day ban.
Suddenly it started happening to anyone who described a violent incident. Shit like "He was murdered" didn't get a removal, but "He was shot in the face, and chunks of his brain matter flew out", was removed.
It's a shit hole. It truly is.