This isn't a 1 year fluke or glitch in the data, either. It's 8 years. That's a significant enough time to smooth out the data.
There was a 20 year period between about 1945 and 1970 where surface temperatures didn't rise, yet you admit that it's "obvious" the earth has been warming over the last century.
This what justification looks like, you want 8 years to be enough time to prove you're right yet without realizing it you've already conceded that 20 years isn't enough time.
You have some good points, but your defective reasoning leads you to wrong views like a gas that takes hundreds of years to build up heat should show an effect immediately, plants loving extreme heat, plants being limited by CO2 (they're mostly limited by sun, water, and nutrients like nitrogen and potassium), and so on.
Stop trying to justify your beliefs, stick to the facts, and you'll make much better arguments.
There was a 20 year period between about 1945 and 1970 where surface temperatures didn't rise, yet you admit that it's "obvious" the earth has been warming over the last century.
This what justification looks like, you want 8 years to be enough time to prove you're right yet without realizing it you've already conceded that 20 years isn't enough time.
You have some good points, but your defective reasoning leads you to wrong views like a gas that takes hundreds of years to build up heat should show an effect immediately, plants loving extreme heat, plants being limited by CO2 (they're mostly limited by sun, water, and nutrients like nitrogen and potassium), and so on.
Stop trying to justify your beliefs, stick to the facts, and you'll make much better arguments.