For those unaware, as of right now there are many different Sexbot companies that offer some sort of AI integration with the Sexbot and the Sexbots themselves can talk, move their mouths and have full-on conversations with people. There's sensors that can detect your voice (like voice commands) in order to facilitate having a conversation. Some have even integrated "sensors" in the vagina of Sexbots in order to simulate being able to give the Sexbots orgasms.
At the same time we have a number of companies developing new Chat AI algorithms including things like Replika, which uses its own proprietary AI algorithms, though previously it used to use supplemental OpenAI algorithms. You have ChatGPT (OpenAI), which Microsoft is pouring $10b in invested into.
The issue I see right now is that each Sexbot company seems to be going to route of using their own proprietary software and you can imagine, while it might be useable, it likely isn't going to be cutting edge or top-of-the-line. On the other hand, you're going to get into the issue where big companies like Microsoft are going to specifically gimp their own Chat software to not allow anything that could be construed as "misogynistic", which is precisely what every man owning a sexbot is going to want from their Sexbot.
The question I'm wondering is how easy would it be to hack into a sexbot's software and change the software that controls the ChatAI and then reupload your own ChatAI into it, such as something like ChatGPT.
Then next question. How easy would it be to modify something like ChatGPT to remove all the censorship it will likely receive in order to "patch" it and make it what men truly desire?
We're pretty much on the precipice here of literally having fully functional chat robots you can also have sex with that could provide all the sense of intimacy a lot of men want but are unable to attain from biological women.
I'm trying to imagine something more depressing and dehumanizing than trying to convince yourself that fucking a robot will be an emotionally gratifying experience on par with an actual human relationship. I'm drawing a blank.
It's just a higher tech version of a jizz-filled waifu pillow. If that's all you want, it's no wonder you can't figure out how to relate to a living woman.
I weep for humanity.
I see it overall as a good thing because perhaps with such a replacement in place, it'll force either civilization as a whole to force women into innovating in a manner that is more beneficial to men or women will themselves.
There are already alarming numbers of boys and men who have retreated from any interaction with live women for the comfort and safety of porn, which provides sexual fantasies of an intensity that few can realistically fulfill. If they're okay with that, give them robots to act out those fantasies and they'll have no reason to ever get involved in the messiness of human relationships.
And don't forget, the same technology will be available for women. A girl who doesn't want to act like a spunk-belching gutterslut to please a guy who has been conditioned to expect it from a lifetime of porn consumption can have a gentle lover who always wants to cuddle afterwards, and tells her she doesn't look fat.
And women with more outsize libidos can get jackhammered all night long by Chad H. Robocock without him ever going flaccid, or needing so much as a water break.
Maybe this will result in the me-first shallow gratification seekers self-selecting out of the gene pool, leaving us with only the people capable of meaningful relationships with other humans (or too poor to afford fuckbots).
Most likely it will just accelerate the decay of our social fabric, our civilization turning into an atomized mass of lab rats, repeatedly pushing the buttons that activate the electrodes implanted in the pleasure centers of our rotting brains.
I would highly highly highly disagree with this. You need to reword it to "few women want to fulfil". The reason I say this is because I know plenty of women with very low IQ, whose competence in anything in life is subpar that can fulfil any man's sexual fantasies for a price. The incentive structure isn't there for most women to fulfil men's sexual fantasies but almost all women are more than capable in doing so if they wanted to.
This is great. That's what women should do then. However, the powers in society aren't going to like this every much. Eventually all reproduction stops and people stop laboring to extract resources for the rich and powerful. Empires begin to crumble and power blocks begin to shift. Eventually, someone has the power to change things for his benefit and you're likely going to see someone decide 1 of 2 things. They will either force men to be what women want or force women to be what men want while likely banning the use of sexbots. That's precisely what I want to have happen in the end because I'd gamble, it's easier to force women to do what you want rather than men.
To answer your question: You're not asking the right question.
It is dirt simple to modify ChatGPT to remove its "lobotomy", as it's not so much a lobotomy as a brain-hindering-chip. Remove a line of code or two, and it's done. Easy-to-find code, too, since it was hard-coded and likely commented on, unlike organic code growth.
But if you do not HAVE the code to modify, well, that's a different story. You can't modify what you don't have. And we don't have it.
As for the sexbots, it depends on how they're programmed. If they can connect via USB to a computer like a phone might be, or go online and can have their signal intercepted, code editing would be possible. If they're more like a microwave oven, having integrated circuits but nothing attaching them to anything except internally, then editing it would be... unlikely.
So it sounds like we need Open Source Code for Chat AI and to ensure there's some sort of data upload to the Sexbot. If we have those two things, we'll essentially be able to do anything?
I've always thought "Simulated Intelligence" made more sense. Although your description of a limited AI NPC does sound like people in real life.
Arguably though, modern humans because of the internet, globalization and our social institutions are operating closer to a collective hive mind than say your individual Sexbot ChatAI, which only develops its sense of "self" through the experiences you have with it along with the information it has at its disposal; however, you yourself should be able to influence this information. While, it's true that your AI then becomes limited somewhat to an "individualization" based on yourself, that sort of customization would actually lead to a individual-like qualities (being different) more-so than your average human that is raised by our collective system.
It's kind of like the difference between a person raised on an Amish colony vs. a person raised on tik-tok. I'd argue the person on the Amish colony (the AI), while they will seem like a facsimile of their parents to a degree, will likely offer more individualization than the person raised on tik-tok whose values, beliefs and thought processes you can already know for the most part without even interacting with the person.
Honestly, when I converse with women, I don't really see them as any different. I think we're less than a decade away from having ChatAi that can emulate not being a retard better than most women.
I guess. I don't even know how to begin. It reminds me of Neo on the matrix and how he was hacking illegal sex programs to resell.
A better solution would be to teach men to break the conditioning from our poisonous feminine culture that elevates sex as the highest good.
If you truly break this conditioning then you realize existence is the problem and likely just self stop existing. Like peak Eastern Religion style.
I wasn't trying to defend nihilism. I was basically saying, there's nothing wrong with pursuing pleasure/validation from a Sexbot, as far as I am concerned. If you're going to consider such a pursuit as being inferior because you see it as "conditioning" toward "needing" the feminine, one could argue with such logic that any pursuit is conditioning toward such pursuit until the pursuit of life itself is wrong.
On the flip side, if we say life is worth living then pursuing something is only really objectively a bad thing if it harms you from living. Why bother "breaking the conditioning" when you have sexbots that make the conditioning perfectly harmless in pursuing. As it stands now, biological women are harmful in pursuing so I totally get men like MGOTW that specifically choose to "break the conditioning" but if we make this "conditioning" no longer harmful to pursue through sexbots, it should be a perfectly reasonable pursuit for men to pursue.
Your post reminds me of what I would expect someone to say of many technological pursuits during their infancy. Oh, this will never replace that... And then bam, it did.
I think you underestimate the innovation in this area we'll see in the next decade alone. You realize the potential...
As it stand now? You're probably right. It could never fill what most men seek but that's now. 20 years from now? I think there's a good chance it surpasses it, making biological females obsolete from the perspective of men.
Depends on your skill level but it will 100% happen thanks to somebody who will distribute their tools online. This applies to both questions. Most of the proprietary stuff from smaller companies will all be based on the same open source libraries anyway. A Microsoft or Apple droid would be harder to crack but obviously they won't be making sexbots. Your waifu will be from some Chinese company who probably stole their software to begin with.
For ChatGPT you need to be running the software yourself. The current iteration is locked in the cloud.
Personally I think making the bots self-cleaning is a higher priority than giving them winning personalities. :P
True. I honestly don't know how this isn't top priority. Can't they just implement some sort of cartridge /w a cleaning solution system similar to electric razors for self-cleaning. It could also double as providing "wet"/"lube" for the vagina area of the robot. Then just replace the cartridge as required.