There's a lot of good stuff here, and I agree, but there's still one more major hurdle to male participation in teaching, and that's parents.
Single moms seldom understand the importance of positive male role models for their kids, and even parents in intact families tend to view any man who shows an interest in teaching or mentoring kids with deep suspicion. That's every bit as true on the right as it is on the left, and it's a problem.
In general, I agree with a universal regime of school choice, but I think you'd be surprised how many parents, even conservative parents, would still choose to place their kids in schools where the staff was predominantly female.
and even parents in intact families tend to view any man who shows an interest in teaching or mentoring kids with deep suspicion. That's every bit as true on the right as it is on the left, and it's a problem.
And maybe for understandable reasons. It's not hard to imagine that now, half a century into this anti-male insanity, the number of men willing to put their own livelihoods at risk for children that are not their own must have shrunk, but meanwhile, the number of degenerates has only gone up. To quote RLM, you may not have noticed, but your brain did. The lack of positive male role models is a vicious circle that leads to fewer trustworthy male role models. Not that you can trust women any more than men (less, probably), but the damage has already been done.
This, along with the loss of knowledge being passed down between generations, is one of the long-term consequences of feminism we're already neck-deep in. Even if we somehow waved a magic wand and stomped this shit out now, it would still be a multi-generational project to repair the damage. Maybe even longer than it took to cause in the first place.
I don't believe the number of pedos and related perverts is any higher now than it was when kids like Tom Sawyer were left to wander through the countryside unaccompanied. The only difference now is that there's less social stigma so they're more open about it.
There's a lot of good stuff here, and I agree, but there's still one more major hurdle to male participation in teaching, and that's parents.
Single moms seldom understand the importance of positive male role models for their kids, and even parents in intact families tend to view any man who shows an interest in teaching or mentoring kids with deep suspicion. That's every bit as true on the right as it is on the left, and it's a problem.
In general, I agree with a universal regime of school choice, but I think you'd be surprised how many parents, even conservative parents, would still choose to place their kids in schools where the staff was predominantly female.
And maybe for understandable reasons. It's not hard to imagine that now, half a century into this anti-male insanity, the number of men willing to put their own livelihoods at risk for children that are not their own must have shrunk, but meanwhile, the number of degenerates has only gone up. To quote RLM, you may not have noticed, but your brain did. The lack of positive male role models is a vicious circle that leads to fewer trustworthy male role models. Not that you can trust women any more than men (less, probably), but the damage has already been done.
This, along with the loss of knowledge being passed down between generations, is one of the long-term consequences of feminism we're already neck-deep in. Even if we somehow waved a magic wand and stomped this shit out now, it would still be a multi-generational project to repair the damage. Maybe even longer than it took to cause in the first place.
I don't believe the number of pedos and related perverts is any higher now than it was when kids like Tom Sawyer were left to wander through the countryside unaccompanied. The only difference now is that there's less social stigma so they're more open about it.
Well yeah, back then if you were caught you simply disappeared mysteriously. Now you get promoted or shuffled to a new job of fresh targets.