Andrew Tate story was a distraction to suppress the JP Morgan Story
(www.youtube.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (18)
sorted by:
This whole "distraction" thing is ridiculous. If the people weren't distracted, what would have happened? Nothing. So why do you need a distraction? lol... Makes 0 sense.
John Q. Public is too much of a fucking ass to care. These are people that think a means to pay bills is a replacement for a personality.
JP Morgan seems like big banking institution and them being tied to Epstein Island child trafficking look obviously bad in their eyes. Remember how big story of Epstein was. If you look at the number of engagement about JP Morgan, it's just a few hundred people talking about it. As for Andrew Tate, 1000 of normies will be talking about him even though he's just a nobody.
Not only that General Attorney filing a child traffcking lawsuit is a woman of colour and JP Morgan probably bribed the current administration to stop her. To the elites nothing's more threatening than a woman of colour finding out they are into degenerate shit. If this was a big story, people would be riled up about their current action, not just their connections to child trafficking.
Oi, gotta loiscence fer that?
Distractions and misdirection are just PR, a way to manage the narrative. It's constantly happening. The question is whether this Andrew Tate thing was (1) deliberately manufactured as a way to distract from JPMorgan/Epstein affair or (2) just a more convenient news story for the media to focus on that supported their narrative.
The media only reports on things that support their narrative. They purposely ignore and obfuscate everything else. This situation was nothing new in this regard.
While it's not beyond the establishment to create a story to distract from another one, IMHO It was almost certainly the latter. The JPMorgan/Epstein story just wasn't enough of a threat for them to take such action.