I can take a guess at why they would make an example of him.
It's symbolic. It's saying that anyone who stands against women will fall, that their victory is inevitable. If that's right, it will "leak" that the case is fraudulent, but he will be locked up anyway. It will show that facts don't matter, women always win.
Now I'm starting to wonder why the US fought the Taliban. Did they know too much?
Andrew Tate is the MRA equivalent of a shock jock. That's probably the best way to describe him.
Honestly, until the regime went after him, I thought he was a grifter.
He still probably is. They’ve just very oddly decided to “make an example of him”, it seems…
Seems very “inorganic”, all the coverage, social media, etc…
Much like when Greta first “blew up”…
I’ve been around the sort of activist “scene” enough to know those things don’t really happen organically. All very suss. All of it.
I can take a guess at why they would make an example of him.
It's symbolic. It's saying that anyone who stands against women will fall, that their victory is inevitable. If that's right, it will "leak" that the case is fraudulent, but he will be locked up anyway. It will show that facts don't matter, women always win.
Exactly, my thought as well.