Pekka Hemalainan is pretty much the only historian who studies native tribes during the European colonization. His recent book talks about how the tribes didn't view Europeans as much of a challenge or difficulty. The loss of land came from their own arrogance than anything to do with the idea of European dominance.
Basically, European colonies survived by going to places the other tribes didn't consider important. Another tribe had died off, and the Europeans settled in that land? Sure go ahead.
This follows similar ideas in business tech called Disruption. Nintendo has specifically tried to emulate the ideas from books based on those studies. They let Sony and Microsoft battle for the same players, and then offer it to everyone else, with a few games those other players might enjoy as well.
I bring this up because the same ideas are being used to promote the 'great replacement'. The POC are not that important, but they should be given all this power because they aren't a threat.
It's not so much disruption as there was no such thing as "private property" for native tribes, since these tribes were nomads.
Civilizations are not universal. For the british empire, northern America was just yet another avenue for "growth". After all, Adam Smith the father of capitalism, was british.
"the great replacement" is going to happen because white westerners are massively cucks, simps and idiots who spend their time trying to pander to eunuchs all the time for god knows what reason...
Civilizations come and go, the LGBT civilization obviously isn't going to reproduce itself since gay sex can't produce babies, and white women who massively vote progressive want abortions as they see babies as a liability.
Most European settlers in the U.S. and Canada came into land that had been devastated by disease. Indian numbers were no threat. The lands they colonized were either considered cursed/diseased or were off-season grounds for tribes that stood no chance due to lack of numbers. The Iroquois League had been a recent formation by the time white settlers came because of this power vacuum.
It was only just burning through South America when the Inca were conquered. And most of them were killed by native tribes they had oppressed and joined the Spanish starting with the Maya and Aztecs. That's why most latinos in the Americas don't look white, they're not. Even in Mexico. They might have a little white in them, but they are mostly native Indians. It's the opposite of white americans. What's funny is, there are groups of white Latinos in those countries who are almost exclusively Spaniard or Spaniard/French/English background because they are descended from the aristocracy and refused to breed with common stock. Don't forget the white descendants of merchants, prisoners, wrecked colonial vessels, slave traders, sailors, expats., the list goes on. Then there are the losers of various wars, like the Southerners from the U.S., exiled French, Portuguese nobles, the Germans. All of them are white and most speak Spanish or Portuguese. All of them settled in areas where there was no more natives because of disease or war.
I descend from those German colonists in Argentina. There was a caste system based on complexion for a long time.
This was going to be longer, but my wife decided facebook videos should be heard as I was typing.
I need more on that last part about the great replacement. That's not a fully-formed thought.
I agree. My apologies, I had a headache.
From the point of view of the WEF type folks, people of color are a means to gain more power for themselves. The Comanche had similar thoughts for Europeans. To the tribal nation, Europeans had guns and steel that could be taken or traded for. The Spanish had forts, but didn't really own the land because the commanche easily swept in and got what they wanted. These forts paid taxes or were destroyed.
The same can be said about how the various governments view immigration. To them, this is a powerless people that will just as soon riot in their own part of town, and be powerless outside it. This is an easily controlled group that can move into the enemy's camp and replace them. At no point do you see the realization that these new immigrants have no loyalties to them or desire to follow once they are in power.
Ah. Definitely agree.
If it was actually true, then it wouldn't have taken 400 years and constant losses. The guns and iron was a major trade item. True story, the Hawaiian islands were taken over because King Kamehameha had cannons.
He might enjoy it. The tribes are mostly matriarchal as view warriors as second class citizens. They either get materials or shouldn't come back. This pressure for power and vanity is what led to all the raids and wars against each other.