I'm just trying to collect examples that particularly stand out, at the moment.
My own boycott list grew to an unmanageable length by giving absolutely no concessions, so this is my attempt at a public one that is more manageable. Even this one grew a lot over the year, so I've started the Priority Targets list.
See, this is the kind of list I'm trying to avoid. It's too long and probably includes a lot of empty virtue signals.
Which companies actually put something tangible behind the words and which ones just said the words? The former deserve the list, the latter should just be monitored.
It's the same thing I have with IWD, I believe it is a dogwhistle of hatred, but without tangible evidence of feminist support, all I have is a list of companies saying "we <3 women".
HBO - Trying to normalize desire for male genocide.
Parent company : AT&T
I think you could probably just put AT&T on the list and have their various subsidiaries underneath - they're plenty terrible in their own right, and other subsidiaries like DirectTV are in lock-step with the feminist globohomo agenda.
I've said this before and I'll say this again. You should instead make a list of all companies that are outwardly male chauvinistic. Then we should only support those companies.
My default view in this society is that all companies are gynocratic unless they expressively state otherwise.
It's better than previous ones, but there's still some fat you've got to trim.
Intel - "We believe in a future that's female." It's a reference to a paper talking about reducing the male population. These things go through days of checks to make sure they don't offend someone. There's no way that's an accident.
Either eliminate stuff like this, or come up with something better (which surely you can find).
I'm just trying to collect examples that particularly stand out, at the moment.
My own boycott list grew to an unmanageable length by giving absolutely no concessions, so this is my attempt at a public one that is more manageable. Even this one grew a lot over the year, so I've started the Priority Targets list.
See, this is the kind of list I'm trying to avoid. It's too long and probably includes a lot of empty virtue signals.
Which companies actually put something tangible behind the words and which ones just said the words? The former deserve the list, the latter should just be monitored.
It's the same thing I have with IWD, I believe it is a dogwhistle of hatred, but without tangible evidence of feminist support, all I have is a list of companies saying "we <3 women".
I think you could probably just put AT&T on the list and have their various subsidiaries underneath - they're plenty terrible in their own right, and other subsidiaries like DirectTV are in lock-step with the feminist globohomo agenda.
Agree with that. In the same vein, DICE should probably be replaced by EA.
I've said this before and I'll say this again. You should instead make a list of all companies that are outwardly male chauvinistic. Then we should only support those companies.
My default view in this society is that all companies are gynocratic unless they expressively state otherwise.
Wouldn't that just mean that all you can buy is Andrew Tate merchandise?
That's a start.
Planters Peanuts is safe, thank God.
So pretty much every corporation, school, mainstream media channel, and social media platform in existence?
Well, you have to narrow it down so I set certain criteria to add a company.
It's better than previous ones, but there's still some fat you've got to trim.
Either eliminate stuff like this, or come up with something better (which surely you can find).