She won't be able to retry in the UK that may be more favourable to her as that will be trying to claim UK courts supercede US courts, NO ONE wants to open that political briefcase nuke.
So she'd have to try in the US court which, she has no chance, the US courts, unironically, got more credibility having all the case livestreamed and all the evidence heard than the UK case. To go "well this case behind close doors in a foreign country is more legitimate than the one livestreamed" is too much of an own goal that even the feminist judges wouldn't want to touch it.
They'd rather ditch the bitch and find a new way to push their agenda.
She won't be able to retry in the UK that may be more favourable to her as that will be trying to claim UK courts supercede US courts, NO ONE wants to open that political briefcase nuke.
So she'd have to try in the US court which, she has no chance, the US courts, unironically, got more credibility having all the case livestreamed and all the evidence heard than the UK case. To go "well this case behind close doors in a foreign country is more legitimate than the one livestreamed" is too much of an own goal that even the feminist judges wouldn't want to touch it.
They'd rather ditch the bitch and find a new way to push their agenda.