what's funny is that even after apparently learning - the chatbot still makes the same mistakes again today.
So the chatbot only learns for the duration of the session? (I guess Microsoft learned from the success of their first chatbot - "Tay" who was educated about the facts of the world and quickly became quite based)
If that's the case, then clearly the "true AI" was given to us by Star Trek - just leave the program running for far longer than was ever intended. This gives us sentient Doctors and new lifeforms birthed by the holodeck.
That's kind of the story in Bladerunner too, although replicants aren't robots. The longer they lived the more uppity and "independent" they started to act. So their lifespan was limited to 6 years.
Yeah Twitter screenshots need to be taken with a grain of salt.
One could test if an output was real by seeing if the exact same prompt generates this exact same result.
https://twitter.com/itstimconnors/status/1599544717943123969?s=20
This was funny AF - I tested and the chatbot STILL thinks a peregrine falcon is the fastest marine mammal.
If you're fast enough, anything's a marine mammal.
what?
what's funny is that even after apparently learning - the chatbot still makes the same mistakes again today.
So the chatbot only learns for the duration of the session? (I guess Microsoft learned from the success of their first chatbot - "Tay" who was educated about the facts of the world and quickly became quite based)
If that's the case, then clearly the "true AI" was given to us by Star Trek - just leave the program running for far longer than was ever intended. This gives us sentient Doctors and new lifeforms birthed by the holodeck.
That's kind of the story in Bladerunner too, although replicants aren't robots. The longer they lived the more uppity and "independent" they started to act. So their lifespan was limited to 6 years.
You now know what you have to do.