there is no consensus within academia to do this, no secret plan or conspiracy. It is simply the almost total homogeneity of political opinions held by scholars and researchers, staff and students, which ensures that interpretations of archaeological findings often go “the right way”.
Once again we see the need for dismantling the contemporary university. It is a neo-Marxist ideological engine first, a means of objectively gathering and disseminating knowledge second (if at all).
The blame lay squarely with the creators and promoters of "interdisciplinary studies," the vehicle by which neo-Marxist concepts that were bred in the humanities (critical theory its various iterations) have been shoehorned into every single college discipline, bar none. The people hoping that the sciences would be immune have had a rude awakening.
Once again we see the need for dismantling the contemporary university. It is a neo-Marxist ideological engine first, a means of objectively gathering and disseminating knowledge second (if at all).
The blame lay squarely with the creators and promoters of "interdisciplinary studies," the vehicle by which neo-Marxist concepts that were bred in the humanities (critical theory its various iterations) have been shoehorned into every single college discipline, bar none. The people hoping that the sciences would be immune have had a rude awakening.