OK, what do you support regarding Asians in universities?
I support the creation of a White ethnostate. If we absolutely, positively need some small set of Asians to be educated at our universities, we can have that. We could also have them as part of building relationships with various Asian countries. What is far more dubious is allowing them to dominate them or move into political, economic, etc. leadership positions.
barring immigration is perfectly fine
Does that include barring immigration specifically for the purpose of maintaining a White majority?
Israel is a Jewish state. So it's OK for Israel to exclude non-Jews. France is a French state. So it's OK for France to exclude non-French. We've gone over this.
Do we get a White, as in White American, state? Yay or nay?
I support the creation of a White ethnostate. If we absolutely, positively need some small set of Asians to be educated at our universities, we can have that. We could also have them as part of building relationships with various Asian countries. What is far more dubious is allowing them to dominate them or move into political, economic, etc. leadership positions.
OK, so you want to deport Asians. But what if you don't succeed in that? Should they be disadvantaged compared to whites going to university?
Does that include barring immigration specifically for the purpose of maintaining a White majority?
If France bans any immigration except for the French, that has the same result without any distasteful racial nonsense.
Though of course, any country has the right to ban anyone it doesn't want from coming in, for whatever reason - even illegitimate ones. If you would rather have a white Muslim or a white SJWs over Thomas Sowell, then that's your business.
Do we get a White, as in White American, state? Yay or nay?
In that will I approve of you deporting 40% of your population to get a 'white (not capitalized) American' country? Obviously not.
There would be some universities that are "Asian" and others that are "White," with some limited exceptions in there.
What of the presently existing universities?
That would have plenty of "racial nonsense" and definitely would be attacked as racist.
None, because the determination is not based on race. The fact that idiots would attack is as racist is immaterial. They say that about everything.
We don't need to do that. We could have a portion of it that is for us, specifically.
I don't oppose that, unless you want to ethnically cleanse people from those areas. I won't pretend to understand why you'd rather have a purple-haired, nose-ringed SJW as a neighbor than Clarence Thomas, but you do you.
I would have them being prioritizing local and regional residents over national and international ones. That alone would de-diversify them.
None, because the determination is not based on race.
It's about ancestry. Race is just a cluster of ancestries.
I won't pretend to understand why you'd rather have a purple-haired, nose-ringed SJW as a neighbor than Clarence Thomas, but you do you.
Such people are products of a system that if dismantled would stop producing them. That would be obvious to you if you weren't such a liberal. When are you going to add new entries to the "based black guy" rolodex?
I support the creation of a White ethnostate. If we absolutely, positively need some small set of Asians to be educated at our universities, we can have that. We could also have them as part of building relationships with various Asian countries. What is far more dubious is allowing them to dominate them or move into political, economic, etc. leadership positions.
Does that include barring immigration specifically for the purpose of maintaining a White majority?
Do we get a White, as in White American, state? Yay or nay?
OK, so you want to deport Asians. But what if you don't succeed in that? Should they be disadvantaged compared to whites going to university?
If France bans any immigration except for the French, that has the same result without any distasteful racial nonsense.
Though of course, any country has the right to ban anyone it doesn't want from coming in, for whatever reason - even illegitimate ones. If you would rather have a white Muslim or a white SJWs over Thomas Sowell, then that's your business.
In that will I approve of you deporting 40% of your population to get a 'white (not capitalized) American' country? Obviously not.
There would be some universities that are "Asian" and others that are "White," with some limited exceptions in there.
That would have plenty of "racial nonsense" and definitely would be attacked as racist.
We don't need to do that. We could have a portion of it that is for us, specifically.
What of the presently existing universities?
None, because the determination is not based on race. The fact that idiots would attack is as racist is immaterial. They say that about everything.
I don't oppose that, unless you want to ethnically cleanse people from those areas. I won't pretend to understand why you'd rather have a purple-haired, nose-ringed SJW as a neighbor than Clarence Thomas, but you do you.
I would have them being prioritizing local and regional residents over national and international ones. That alone would de-diversify them.
It's about ancestry. Race is just a cluster of ancestries.
Such people are products of a system that if dismantled would stop producing them. That would be obvious to you if you weren't such a liberal. When are you going to add new entries to the "based black guy" rolodex?