Regardless of the truth of the statement in other circumstances, what you've said is fundamentally irrelevant here.
Nay, it was providing an example of ambiguous "requests" given with the illusion of choice are still orders because the unspoken understanding is that saying no will bring consequences if not force. You wanting to do it, which seems to be your fundamental hangup, is what is irrelevant to that.
That's the entire problem here. You think them being willing to do it somehow makes it not an order, which isn't the reality of how words or authority works. I don't care about your little soapboxes about the nature of the world when you can't handle basic words.
Nay, it was providing an example of ambiguous "requests" given with the illusion of choice are still orders because the unspoken understanding is that saying no will bring consequences if not force. You wanting to do it, which seems to be your fundamental hangup, is what is irrelevant to that.
That's the entire problem here. You think them being willing to do it somehow makes it not an order, which isn't the reality of how words or authority works. I don't care about your little soapboxes about the nature of the world when you can't handle basic words.