Finland has one of the largest and strongest military forces in Europe. It just so happens that while the "active" military is small, Finland is designed around a rapid mass mobilization of force larger and better equipped than almost every other European country.
The long border with Russia is irrelevant since it's mostly impassible ice over which Russia only has 1 road. Russia is hugely vulnerable to attack in the far north, where it has stationed the bulk of its nuclear and air assets, yet it has no logistical capabilities to reinforce and defend that area if placed under threat by Finland.
As per above, the only places where there would be any real fighting would be the populated south near Saint Petersburg, and limited fighting near Murmansk only if Finland were to attack.
I'm sitting here laughing, though. Finland is joining NATO and you Russians REEEEEing about it online is just a waste of Russia's already weak finances.
The war between Russia and Finland wouldn't last longer than a few hours at max. Finland's capital would be occupied in 30 minutes from beginning of the war.
I guess they really need to join NATO and buy weapons from Raytheon then.
spending a small amount on your national defense isn't "warmongering"
invading Ukraine is literal "warmongering"
you're like a rapist who keeps threatening a woman with rape, and then when said woman decides to buy a can of pepper spray to defend herself, you respond by calling her a rapist.
lol ok buddy. maybe that works in Russia, but over here in the West all the idiots are fully programmed by the Left and there is no one else stupid enough to believe you.
Finland has one of the largest and strongest military forces in Europe. It just so happens that while the "active" military is small, Finland is designed around a rapid mass mobilization of force larger and better equipped than almost every other European country.
The long border with Russia is irrelevant since it's mostly impassible ice over which Russia only has 1 road. Russia is hugely vulnerable to attack in the far north, where it has stationed the bulk of its nuclear and air assets, yet it has no logistical capabilities to reinforce and defend that area if placed under threat by Finland.
Russia has no actual capability to attack Finland over the vast length of the border, as the terrain is impassible to logistics. Russia's logistics rely on trains, and without train links, Russian logistics are basically worthless, as we can see proven in the Ukraine war. Russia only has a single railway, and it's far from the border, with no roads and other basic logistics necessities to actually support military units to attack Finland.
As per above, the only places where there would be any real fighting would be the populated south near Saint Petersburg, and limited fighting near Murmansk only if Finland were to attack.
I'm sitting here laughing, though. Finland is joining NATO and you Russians REEEEEing about it online is just a waste of Russia's already weak finances.
I guess they really need to join NATO and buy weapons from Raytheon then.
joining NATO isn't "warmongering"
spending a small amount on your national defense isn't "warmongering"
invading Ukraine is literal "warmongering"
you're like a rapist who keeps threatening a woman with rape, and then when said woman decides to buy a can of pepper spray to defend herself, you respond by calling her a rapist.
lol ok buddy. maybe that works in Russia, but over here in the West all the idiots are fully programmed by the Left and there is no one else stupid enough to believe you.