2001, my highschool teachers desperately trying to get boys to take Home Economics (cooking and sewing) and girls to take Design Techology (shop class). Despite their attempts to propagandize us, both classes end up skewed with 90% stereotypical gender ratios.
The girls lining up for the milling machine: Tomboys, autists, lesbians.
The boys lining up for the sewing machine: Flaming homosexuals and autists stroking their cocks at the thought of being in a room full of girls.
I never said it was useless at all. In fact, it's virtually certain that more of the kids who took home economics got more use out that education than the kids who took shop, regardless of whether they're male or female.
But I was not making a value judgement on the content of each class. I was making a simple observation about the sort of activities that naturally appeal to the overwhelming majority of males, and the overwhelming majority of females.
2001, my highschool teachers desperately trying to get boys to take Home Economics (cooking and sewing) and girls to take Design Techology (shop class). Despite their attempts to propagandize us, both classes end up skewed with 90% stereotypical gender ratios.
The girls lining up for the milling machine: Tomboys, autists, lesbians.
The boys lining up for the sewing machine: Flaming homosexuals and autists stroking their cocks at the thought of being in a room full of girls.
HEY!
I took Home Economics because I couldn't cook for shit. I learned how to actually use an oven and make pasta, which has served me well.
I never said it was useless at all. In fact, it's virtually certain that more of the kids who took home economics got more use out that education than the kids who took shop, regardless of whether they're male or female.
But I was not making a value judgement on the content of each class. I was making a simple observation about the sort of activities that naturally appeal to the overwhelming majority of males, and the overwhelming majority of females.