No, the actual problem is that in the 90's everyone forgot that Louis Farrakhan was a Malcolm X follower (a guy who criticized King for not being violent enough). And then when X jumped ship to actual Islam, Farrakhan almost certainly had him killed.
But then the Democrats win the White House and he puts on the Million Man March and lo, everything is forgotten.
The whole country was duped into thinking Farrakhan was a "civil rights activist", instead of a race war extremist.
No, the actual problem is that in the 90's everyone forgot that Louis Farrakhan was a Malcolm X follower (a guy who criticized King for not being violent enough). And then when X jumped ship to actual Islam, Farrakhan almost certainly had him killed.
But then the Democrats win the White House and he puts on the Million Man March and lo, everything is forgotten.
The whole country was duped into thinking Farrakhan was a "civil rights activist", instead of a race war extremist.
keep pretending it's about religion, nobody buys that shit.
Nobody... in your circle.
But the overwhelming majority of normies, if you use the term "jewish", assume you mean a religion.
In the normie zeitgeist, there is no jewish ethnicity. They're just white people who go to different church and don't eat bacon.
lol what an atheist jew?
Your framing is such that I don't even understand what you're saying here.
Linguistically, to the overwhelming majority of normies, there is no ethnicity component to the word "jewish".
Average normie American believes they could call themselves jewish if they were willing to give up pork.
Doesn't matter that the actual jewish disagree with them on that point. In the normie zeitgeist, it's a religion and nothing else, not an ethnicity.
Your attempts to use the word as an ethnicity will always end in misinterpretation because that connotation doesn't exist in the normie lexicon.