Amazing they can decide so quick when then denied Waukesha all the way through.
Most likely just a paranoid caller who would have called any act of violence directed at anyone as a 'hate attack' because someone attacked them. Not because any sort of hatred was relevant.
Nothing in the article really tells us anything.
It could be anything, frankly. Jilted ex-lover, angry former employee, gangland style attack, political terrorism, religious terrorism, kinda anything.
Most likely just a paranoid caller who would have called any act of violence directed at anyone as a 'hate attack' because someone attacked them. Not because any sort of hatred was relevant.
Nothing in the article really tells us anything.
It could be anything, frankly. Jilted ex-lover, angry former employee, gangland style attack, political terrorism, religious terrorism, kinda anything.