We all know the story of the ADL's recent actions vindicating critics of Jewish power. We here are also familiar with anti-idpol, the idea that identity politics such as BLM, feminism and white nationalism, etc. are bad and should be discarded in favor of egalatarianism and the movmement/scene/faction/whatever that attempts to make that happen. Anti-idpol's response to the ADL's recent actions has been to declare that the ADL's apparent pro-Jewish activism is merely a front for their real goal, supporting Democrats, a response that I mocked and critiqued more rigorously. Anti-idpol's followup so far has been to sub "Fabian" in place of "Democrat" and restate the argument. This does almost nothing to alleviate the problems with this take that I pointed out in my critique. I suspect anti-idpol will sub nearly any word in the dictionary - with notable ommissions under "J" - in place of "Democrats" to see what they can get to stick if you play their games long enough.
Now imagine if black or white nationalism was in the news doing something bad. Do you think anti-idpol would hesitate to critique either one as a political force? They certainly don't hesitate to condemn white nationalism with the strongest possible language, calling it genocidal. You would think Jewish idpol doing something bad would be a great opportunity for them to point out problems with additional forms of idpol. Instead, they seek to launder Jewish idpol's actions by blaming them on other political forces. How can anyone take so-called anti-idpol seriously when it washes the hands of Jewish idpol like this? It looks fake and gay to me. Will they finally cede ground and admit that we are witnessing Jewish idpol in action?
All of this is wrong. Economics is economics. So long as humans exist, it will continue as it is a natural system. Embracing private property ownership is not damaging to the environment, it's preserving it. Liberalism exists to actually free the populace to engage in trade and property ownership. It provides a protection against moral degeneration, considering that most moral degeneration is coming from state action and political efforts. On top of all of that, the finite resource argument is only true at a scale you really can't get to, it's why Peak Oil is bullshit. Once you remove oil deposits from readily available sources, you can actually get more sources that were yet undiscovered. To tap all undiscovered resources would require so much advancement that you could very easily use the diminishing returns to incentivize supplemental materials.
Okay, I'm adding this comment to the stupid pile.
Yes, you do exist.
I mean, I'm going to assume that you exist and you're not a retarded and poorly programmed bot, so you exist.
And there is no difference between Fascism and Communism that once existed, or that currently exist. They are affirmative systems. They do not have to exist as an outgrowth of Liberalism. They exist despite, inspite of, and without Liberalism.
There's literally tons. Liberalism is actually being quite badly mauld by illeberalism. The entire political Left is Illeberal. Communism is illiberal. Islamism is Illiberal.
Nope. Liberalism doesn't do that. It does the opposite of that by definition. We live in a socialist system; and yes, that is crueler than many dictatorships.
That's also never true. Dictatorial systems can always require colonization of people's minds. Again, Liberalism doesn't create a "false consciousness" (that's the word you're looking for). It actually seeks to prevent the state from doing that by allowing political dissent.