We all know the story of the ADL's recent actions vindicating critics of Jewish power. We here are also familiar with anti-idpol, the idea that identity politics such as BLM, feminism and white nationalism, etc. are bad and should be discarded in favor of egalatarianism and the movmement/scene/faction/whatever that attempts to make that happen. Anti-idpol's response to the ADL's recent actions has been to declare that the ADL's apparent pro-Jewish activism is merely a front for their real goal, supporting Democrats, a response that I mocked and critiqued more rigorously. Anti-idpol's followup so far has been to sub "Fabian" in place of "Democrat" and restate the argument. This does almost nothing to alleviate the problems with this take that I pointed out in my critique. I suspect anti-idpol will sub nearly any word in the dictionary - with notable ommissions under "J" - in place of "Democrats" to see what they can get to stick if you play their games long enough.
Now imagine if black or white nationalism was in the news doing something bad. Do you think anti-idpol would hesitate to critique either one as a political force? They certainly don't hesitate to condemn white nationalism with the strongest possible language, calling it genocidal. You would think Jewish idpol doing something bad would be a great opportunity for them to point out problems with additional forms of idpol. Instead, they seek to launder Jewish idpol's actions by blaming them on other political forces. How can anyone take so-called anti-idpol seriously when it washes the hands of Jewish idpol like this? It looks fake and gay to me. Will they finally cede ground and admit that we are witnessing Jewish idpol in action?
I don't care that some of you don't want to accept that "Jewish IdPol" is a skin-suit for socialism.
BLM has been a National Socialist movement, and I've been condemning them since 2014. I absolutely blame white communists for the violence that they participated in. It's not the first time National Socialists and Communists worked together to destroy the lives of innocent people. It's why I called it a Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact between Black National Socialism and White Communism.
Dismissing the acts of Communists because they are white really shows how blinded by racial ideology you are being.
As with "white socialism's never been tried", I'm counting this as one of the dumbest statements that I've ever heard.
Communism, National Socialism, and Fascism are all Leftist ideologies. They actually exist in direct opposition to Liberalism and seek it's destruction. By definition, they can exist both under and outside of Liberalism.
Capitalism is just a Marxist slur for "Cultural Judaism" so how dare you.
That's shockingly ahistorical. Leftism is a bastardization of Liberalism. Not the other way around. Capitalism is merely a slur. Free market economics are not an ideology, it's just a recognition of economics to the benefit of the general public.
Liberalism does not create any of those things. Again, those ideologies are all reactions against Liberalism and it's corresponding individualism. They exist because people rejected Liberalism, sought to destroy it, and created ideologies to do that. They exist, because the people who invented them said they did.