Always most affected, of course, but at least they've stopped writing "womxn"
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (33)
sorted by:
Yet more proof that women's organizations do not consider men human beings.
Do you remember the Mexican protests from a few years ago? Women were all bent out of shape that only 85% of the murders were men.
The response was to have a strike. A day of absence, where women stop doing the things they do: To show the country how much they need women.
The effect of that protest was ... exactly nothing.
Can you imagine if, say, just Male Truck Drivers took the day off? Or Male Police? Or Male Border Guards? Or (gasp) all three? It wouldn't even be 10% of the working men, and the effects on Mexico would be just about crippling.
They achieved their goal then. They showed exactly how much society needs women.
I would love to see calls for men to go on strike until feminist politicians are ousted, but women covered off that angle by putting their people in charge of the unions.
Men don't like men enough to take collective action like that, Imp.
Look up the ingroup-outgroup tendencies of men vs women. "The Women are Wonderful Effect"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women-are-wonderful_effectt