The Sarah Everard hoax is still cursing the UK, recommendations from her cult's "investigation" of policing have been published.
(www.justiceinspectorates.gov.uk)
Comments (20)
sorted by:
You're the batshit crazy loon who claimed that Sarah Everhard didn't exist and also that she deserved to be murdered, aren't ya?
Let's go through the story.
Miss Everard was out during the lockdown when she was "killed", something that would get a peasant fined, but not a member of the ruling class.
She was flagged down by an off-duty policeman who didn't have his police vehicle and clearly wasn't part of the police for her area.
Rather than run away or call the real police, she chose to go with him.
She then disappeared, something which would usually not make the local news for at least a week, especially in London, but in her case made not just national news but international news mere days after she disappeared.
There was intense focus on her fate, days of reporting until they allegedly found a body.
The officer they accused was former Parliamentary security. While all this was happening, women pushed hard to use this story to finally justify restricting men's freedom, calling for curfews, demanding that public servants are screened for "misogyny" (I.E that they will never help a male victim of a woman's violence)
When her "funeral" was announced, it wasn't attended by family and friends, it was attended by loud, obnoxious misandrists, chanting that they will make men scared to walk the streets. (Female crime rates are up since this point, so much so that the ONS refuses to report them.)
A few weeks after her death, it was revealed that the date she disappeared was the date a government review into what eventually became Liz Truss' flagship policy, the "war on misogyny" was due to be closed, with no recommendations for policy. Women couldn't allow that, so cue the most obviously fake story in human history.
My questions :
If it was real, why did they report on her disappearance almost instantly?
Why are there no pictures of her that aren't from the articles about her disappearance?
Why were US feminists leading calls to kill all men at her funeral?
Are you claiming that no woman was ever fined for violating a lockdown? Dumbass.
If you had any sense, which you don't, you'd be pointing out that the lockdowns and Coronavirus restrictions instilled such obedience to authority that Everhard obeyed an off-duty police officer.
You are quite literally insane.
No, I'm not. You are.
A woman disappearing from London overnight would still be expected to be found hungover outside a bar in her own vomit, not the subject of a nationwide news story.
No disappearance has had so much reporting, so quickly, as "Sarah Everard".
It's blindingly obvious it was a set-up to ratchet up women's campaign of violence towards men by giving them justification, and purging police who would hold them accountable as "misogynist".
It has only served to enable women's vile hate, likely increasing suicides in men through the level of venomous dehumanization towards them that all women engaged in motivated by that story.
LOL! I'm sure I'm the one who'll end up in a straitjacket.
A lot of things are 'blindingly obvious' to you, none of them true. And in fact, you don't even believe your own crap, because if you did, your rage-filled loser ass would not have said that Everhard deserved to be murdered, as you did.
Again, whackjobbery. Men kill women, not vice versa. And Hitler, Stalin and Mao were all men. So it's men's campaign of violence against women.
And your point here is to prove that misogyny exists by being a misogynist?
Anyone as stupid as she allegedly was, if they were male, would not even receive a modicum of sympathy.
Do you not like pedophiles? What are you, a pedophobe?
Same energy here. "Misogyny" is not real. Peer-reviewed academic studies show that women are awful people.
And yet your rage-filled loser ass said that she "deserved to be murdered". Which makes a mockery of your claim that "she didn't exist". Dumbass.
Not only are women much better than you, even feminists are much better than you...
Less hate-filled. Have more of a life.
History and crime rates shows that men are awful people.
She doesn't exist, and you're clinging to that line because you can't defend the official story.
Uhuh. The genocidal lunatics are less hateful.
Wow, using the 0.1% of criminals to generalize. That's the kind of bullshit women pull.
There is no such thing as "misogyny", nor can there ever be, because women's actions, as documented by peer-reviewed, academic study, are unforgivable.
You have been proven to be discriminating against young boys in education.
You have been proven to be the most biased group in human existence.
You have been proven to lack empathy towards those who aren't female.
These are facts, you can't deflect them with "misogyny" and other tall tales of gaslighting bullshit.
Pay the taxpayer back for the money you wasted investigating something as real as the Loch Ness Monster, you lying pieces of utter murderer worshipping garbage.
Take "Justice for Women" to court and reveal their donors!
You disprove it personally.
Stalin, Mao and Hitler? All female.
Who died to defeat Hitler again? Definitely not the cowards who rode Nazi dick to save their own skins.
Did they ever show gratitude? Of course they don't. Even the charity founded to help them, the Royal British Legion, is controlled by a woman now.
Who died to save Hitler? Who died to gas Jews? Apparently, that is forgiveable, but what "women did" (apparently cause you fake-dick hurt) is not.
What? Did women ever show gratitude towards those who actually fought? Of course. Your fake dick has no claim on that gratitude though, since you did not fight and are not even of the same gender as those who did.
Who voted for Hitler in huge numbers?
Typical women's shaming tactics. It's been over 70 years since this was written and they're still the exact same way. Just replace Jew with their new enemy, the tranny, another one they expect everyone else to help them with.
They showed so much gratitude, that 20 or so years after the war, they were back to calling for all men to be killed again.
Not only are you completely whacked in the head, you don't even read the articles that you post.
By 1933, women, of whom there were millions more than men – Berlin had 1,116 women for every 1,000 men – voted in roughly the same percentages as men for Hitler and National Socialist candidates.
Comparing troons to Jews in the Holocaust is new low even for you, you total loon.
Back? Please show me the calls "for all men to be killed" before the war and in 1965. And how many said that. My God, you're stupid.
So, women aren't at all innocent, but nobody ever talks about how women's votes enabled that Nazis. Thanks for proving my point.
The Holocaust? That piece was written in 1932. Hitler wasn't even in power yet. I'm just noticing that women always expected us to fight whatever enemy exists in their heads, including ourselves.
You're really asking me for that? You're not serious...the 60s is well known for feminism.
And yet you were blaming women for Hitler, who is... a man.
Fake bravado doesn't suit you, especially when you didn't even read the article that you posted.
Yes, and you started defending your troons like you always do - most likely because you are a woman who pretends to have transitioned to male.
Produce the calls "for all men to be killed" before World War II and in 1965, or admit that you are a lying sociopath.
No problem, once you accept the below
Stop distracting.