"I'll try ̶s̶p̶i̶n̶n̶i̶n̶g̶ printing more money, that's a good trick!"
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (23)
sorted by:
Whether or not it's a good idea, wouldn't Medicare for All also save people money that they now use to buy private health insurance?
Government is always inefficient. Medicare for all would cost substantially more per capita in taxes than private insurance. Despite that, I have conflicting thoughts about universal guaranteed healthcare.
Someone who isn't an ideologue, I like that.
Yes, government is rather inefficient. But for some reason, countries with 'universal healthcare' spend less on health care than the US with better health outcomes. This has two reasons: the obesity epidemic in the US, and the fact that some health care is delayed or denied for us. But may universal health care not cut out a lot of bureaucracy and form-filling?
Honestly, I don't know. I don't want to support one position or other simply because either my country or 'tribe' supports it, so I just decide to do the wisest thing of all: shut up.
I think the price of healthcare in the US is messed up in a similar convoluted way as university tuition. In both cases, something the state did ruined things. Considering that, perhaps further state encroachment would have counterproductive results.
But is there any place where it actually works fine then? Everywhere else the state does more, not less.