What do people downplaying the crimes of the Nazis get? aside from a mod position at ConPro and a bot that downvotes me?
There is legal precedent for holding those accountable who facilitated harm. The cartoonist for Der Sturmer was executed for war crimes at Nuremberg despite not having harmed any Jews himself.
After the war, Streicher was convicted of crimes against humanity at the end of the Nuremberg trials. Specifically, he was found to have continued his vitriolic antisemitic propaganda when he was well aware that Jews were being murdered. For this, he was executed by hanging.
Streicher was the first member of the Nazi regime held accountable for inciting genocide by the Nuremberg Tribunal.
Another one?
I thought Nuremberg 2.0 was going to be for those who "downplay the crimes of women", which you announced a while back.
I don't have that kind of power. If I did, maybe I'd speak more carefully to ensure the job is done correctly.
So you're still not embarrassed that you proclaimed tribunals for people who "downplay the crimes of the womens"?
How long a sentence am I looking at, girl?
What do people downplaying the crimes of the Nazis get?
aside from a mod position at ConPro and a bot that downvotes me?There is legal precedent for holding those accountable who facilitated harm. The cartoonist for Der Sturmer was executed for war crimes at Nuremberg despite not having harmed any Jews himself.
Why don't you answer the question instead, batshit?